Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation01:08

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical audit and quality improvement: rivals, partners, or one and the same?

Frontiers in health services·2026
Same author

Structural barriers and facilitators of accessing rehabilitation among adults aged 50 years and older with low back pain: a scoping review of the literature.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of soluble corn fiber supplementation for children with asthma.

Frontiers in allergy·2026
Same author

Letter to the editor: <i>risk factors for cervical artery dissection</i> - <i>a systematic review with meta-analysis</i>.

Stroke and vascular neurology·2025
Same author

Predictors of community participation from preschool to school age in children with cerebral palsy.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2025
Same author

Teaching the tools: Focusing effort and engagement when improving medical education.

Medical education·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Developing a common language for evaluation questions in quality and safety improvement.

Mark F Lambert1, Heather Shearer

  • 1NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, Coventry House, University of Warwick Campus, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. mark.lambert@doctors.org.uk

Quality & Safety in Health Care
|August 10, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Healthcare quality improvement evaluations are often complex. This study identified common ground across diverse evaluation frameworks, developing a shared language to improve practitioner communication and service quality.

More Related Videos

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare quality improvement
  • Health services research
  • Program evaluation

Background:

  • Evaluation is crucial for service improvement but is underutilized.
  • Complex and varied language in evaluation guides hinders practitioner communication.
  • Diverse methodological perspectives exist for healthcare quality improvement evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review development and evaluation frameworks for healthcare quality improvement.
  • To identify commonalities and develop a shared language across different evaluation approaches.
  • To facilitate communication and pragmatic evaluation among healthcare practitioners.

Main Methods:

  • Structured literature review of healthcare quality improvement evaluation frameworks.
  • Identification and analysis of four diverse frameworks.
  • Partial mapping of frameworks against a health promotion research structure.
  • Adaptation of a framework to create a common structure for healthcare evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Four distinct healthcare quality improvement evaluation frameworks were identified.
  • A common structure was developed by adapting an existing framework for healthcare evaluation.
  • Significant common ground was found underlying terminological differences in evaluation techniques.
  • A common language was proposed to enhance communication in healthcare evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • A shared language can simplify healthcare evaluation and improve quality and safety.
  • The developed common structure aids practitioners in framing pragmatic evaluations.
  • Addressing terminological variation can reduce barriers to effective healthcare evaluation.
  • This work supports better communication and more consistent application of evaluation methods.