Organ-sparing approaches for testicular masses
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Treating Varicocele-Induced Scrotal Pain
Published on: August 30, 2024
Alvaro Zuniga1, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Michael A S Jewett
1Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital and the University Health Network, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, 3-124, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Abstract:
Organ-sparing approaches are currently practiced in urology for many malignancies. Partial orchiectomy of germ cell tumors (GCT) provides potential benefits over radical surgery by reducing the need for androgen substitution, lessening psychological stress, and preserving fertility, with a durable cure rate. Furthermore, many testicular lesions detected clinically or by ultrasonography will be benign, in which case radical orchiectomy represents overtreatment. Partial orchiectomy for benign lesions allows preservation of endocrine and exocrine function, and reduced risk of local recurrence. However, selection criteria are not clear and one must always be suspicious that a GCT might exist. Carcinoma in situ that remains in the salvaged testicle is a challenge to treat. Radiation therapy is an option, although there is a high chance that patients will subsequently require hormonal replacement. Partial orchiectomy should be undertaken only in selected patients--men with bilateral testicular cancer or GCT in a solitary testis--if the size and location of the mass are amenable to surgery. Informed patient consent discussing radical orchiectomy as the gold standard is mandatory, and discussion of the risks associated with CIS and its treatment, as well as the need for androgen supplementation are paramount. Alternative strategies of organ preservation, such as radiotherapy, HIFU and chemotherapy, might be appropriate treatment options in the future. However, the safety and efficacy of these procedures needs to be demonstrated in comparison with partial orchiectomy in larger and prospective studies with longer follow-up.
Insights
Partial orchiectomy offers benefits for testicular germ cell tumors (GCT) and benign lesions, preserving function and fertility. Careful patient selection and informed consent are crucial due to potential risks like residual carcinoma in situ.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
Background:
- Organ-sparing surgery is increasingly adopted in urology for various malignancies.
- Partial orchiectomy for testicular germ cell tumors (GCT) offers advantages over radical surgery, including preserved endocrine/exocrine function and fertility.
- Many testicular lesions are benign, making radical orchiectomy overtreatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the benefits and challenges of partial orchiectomy for testicular lesions.
- To discuss patient selection criteria and risks associated with organ-sparing approaches.
- To explore alternative organ preservation strategies.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on partial orchiectomy for GCT and benign testicular lesions.
- Analysis of benefits (fertility preservation, endocrine function) and risks (carcinoma in situ, recurrence).
- Discussion of patient selection criteria and informed consent.
Main Results:
- Partial orchiectomy can achieve durable cure rates for GCT while preserving testicular function.
- Benign lesions treated with partial orchiectomy avoid overtreatment and preserve function.
- Challenges include unclear selection criteria, managing residual carcinoma in situ, and potential need for androgen supplementation.
Conclusions:
- Partial orchiectomy is a viable option for selected patients with GCT or benign testicular masses.
- Careful patient selection, informed consent, and vigilant follow-up are essential.
- Further prospective studies are needed to compare organ preservation techniques with partial orchiectomy.
