Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The R Chart

The R Chart

In statistical process control, control charts, particularly R charts, are instrumental in monitoring process variations and identifying non-random patterns that run charts might miss. R charts track the variability within process subgroups, which is crucial when standard deviation use is impractical or unknown process variations exist.
R charts are pivotal for pinpointing shifts in process variability. Stability is indicated when all data points remain within the defined upper and lower...

Introduction to Statistical Process Control

Introduction to Statistical Process Control

Statistical Process Control (SPC) is a method used to monitor and control quality within processes, particularly in manufacturing and service delivery, by employing statistical methods. SPC aims to distinguish between natural (common cause) variation and variation due to specific changes or events (special cause), allowing for timely improvements and sustained quality. The control chart, a pivotal tool in SPC, visually displays data over time alongside a central line of upper and lower control...

The X̄ Chart

The X̄ Chart

The x̄ chart is a statistical tool for monitoring the means in a process.
The x̄ chart, often known as the individual control chart, is a crucial tool in statistical process control. It is designed to monitor process behavior and performance over time and is widely used in various industries to ensure that processes are operating at their optimum capacity and within specified limits.
A x̄ chart is constructed by plotting individual measurements of a quality characteristic in the order in which...

Interpreting Run Charts

Interpreting Run Charts

Run charts, essentially line graphs plotted over time, serve as fundamental yet effective tools for process analysis. They chronicle data sequentially, facilitating the identification of trends, shifts, or cyclical movements. This graphical representation is instrumental in determining whether a process is stable or exhibits signs of potential instability indicative of special cause variation. In the healthcare domain, run charts depict infection rates over time, enabling hospitals to monitor...

Interpreting X̄ Charts

Interpreting X̄ Charts

Interpreting x̄ charts, a type of control chart used in statistical process control helps monitor the variation in processes over time. The x̄ chart is based on the sample mean and allows for monitoring variations in the process mean over time. These charts are pivotal for quality assurance in manufacturing and other sectors.
An x̄ chart plots the values of individual measurements over time against control limits calculated from historical data. The central line represents the process mean,...

Interpreting R Charts

Interpreting R Charts

R chart, or range chart, is a fundamental tool in statistical process control used to monitor the variability within a process. It complements the X-bar (x̄) chart by focusing on the range of the data, rather than individual values, providing a clear picture of the process dispersion over time.
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum values—of a sample...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Determining the Optimal Site of Entry for Colloid Cyst Resection Using an Expandable Tubular Retractor in a Nondilated Ventricular System: Cadaveric Analysis and Illustrative Cases.

Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)·2026

Same author

Long-term changes in breast density reporting after implementation of BI-RADS 5<sup>th</sup> edition guidelines.

Journal of clinical imaging science·2026

Same author

Predictive capacity of mismatch repair status in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of aggressive pituitary tumors and pituitary carcinomas: An illustrative case report and literature review.

Surgical neurology international·2026

Same author

Birth sex ratio in Western Sydney during the COVID-19 pandemic: associations by maternal country of birth.

Reproductive health·2026

Same author

Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, transfer coefficient of the lung for carbon monoxide and forced vital capacity/diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide in suspected systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary hypertension: insights from the ASPIRE registry.

ERJ open research·2026

Same author

Co-designed principles for establishment of a virtual hospital.

Scientific reports·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Implementation of multivariate control charts in a clinical setting.

Mary Waterhouse¹, Ian Smith, Hassan Assareh

¹School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia. mary.waterhouse@gmail.com

International Journal for Quality in Health Care : Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care

|August 12, 2010

Summary

Multivariate control charts like MEWMA and MCUSUM are effective for clinical monitoring, quickly detecting shifts in quality characteristics. Multiple imputation is recommended for handling incomplete patient records in these settings.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Clinical quality monitoring
Statistical process control in healthcare

Background:

Clinical monitoring often requires tracking multiple quality characteristics simultaneously.
Using separate univariate charts can inflate false alarm rates by ignoring variable correlations.
Multivariate control charts offer a more robust approach for complex clinical data.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the implementation and performance of T(2), MEWMA, and MCUSUM charts in clinical settings.
To address challenges such as incomplete data and non-normality.
To provide guidance on selecting appropriate multivariate control charts for clinical use.

Main Methods:

A case study involving radiation monitoring during coronary angiograms at St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital.
Simulation studies to assess chart performance under various conditions (correlation, mean shifts, missing data).
Evaluation of different imputation methods for handling incomplete records.

Main Results:

MEWMA and MCUSUM charts demonstrate rapid detection of small to moderate shifts, even with uncorrelated variables.
The T(2) chart is less effective overall but excels at detecting large shifts.
Multiple imputation is the recommended strategy for managing incomplete datasets.

Conclusions:

MEWMA and MCUSUM charts are superior for detecting subtle changes in clinical quality characteristics.
The T(2) chart has specific applications for identifying significant deviations.
Multiple imputation is a reliable method for addressing missing data in multivariate clinical monitoring.