Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the cochlea, a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Amiodarone induced movement disorder after cardiac arrest - A case report.

Resuscitation plus·2022
Same author

The accuracy of standard audiometric hearing level thresholds in pediatric patients.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2020
Same author

Propofol administration during catheter-directed interventions for intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism is associated with major adverse events.

Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders·2020
Same author

Functional anatomy of the female reproductive system of the American lobster (Homarus americanus).

Journal of morphology·2018
Same author

Functional anatomy of the male reproductive system of the American lobster (Homarus americanus).

Journal of morphology·2018
Same author

Paradoxical Tumor Embolism and Recurrent Intracardiac Mass From Uterine Intravenous Leiomyomatosis.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2016
Same journal

Normative Values for Prosaccade and Antisaccade Eye Movements in Adolescents Using a New Saccadometry Test.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Bilingualism and Aging: Their Impact on Speech Perception in Noise Using the AzBio Sentence Test.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

A Simple Facial Scale for Hearing Loss.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Bimodal Stimulation of the Auditory-Somatosensory System Improves Auditory Sensory Gating Function in Patients with Tinnitus.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Reactions to Tinnitus Based on Color Code Personality Type.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Multidimensional Effects of Hyperacusis: A Study on Tinnitus, Anxiety, Cognitive Function, Sleep, and Quality of Life.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Auditory temporal gap detection in children with and without auditory processing disorder.

Dennis P Phillips1, Michel Comeau, Jessica N Andrus

  • 1Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. dennis.phillips@dal.ca

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|August 13, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Children with auditory processing disorder (APD) struggle with between-channel (BC) gap detection, indicating timing deficits. Within-channel (WC) gap detection remained unaffected, suggesting task-specific auditory processing differences in APD.

More Related Videos

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception research
  • Neuroscience of hearing
  • Child audiology

Background:

  • Auditory gap detection measures temporal acuity.
  • Within-channel (WC) and between-channel (BC) paradigms exist.
  • WC uses identical sounds; BC uses different sounds around the silent gap.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Compare auditory gap detection in typical children and those with auditory processing disorder (APD).
  • Evaluate performance on both WC and BC gap detection tasks.
  • Identify potential differences in temporal processing related to APD.

Main Methods:

  • Measured best gap durations (shortest detectable gaps) for WC and BC paradigms.
  • Used a two-interval, two-alternative forced-choice method.
  • Tested 16 control children and 20 children referred for APD assessment (9 APD+, 11 APD-).

Main Results:

  • Within-channel (WC) best gap durations were similar across all groups.
  • Between-channel (BC) best gap durations significantly differed between groups.
  • The largest difference in BC gap detection was between controls and children diagnosed with APD (APD+).

Conclusions:

  • Between-channel (BC) gap detection performance varies with auditory processing status.
  • Within-channel (WC) gap detection is less sensitive to auditory processing deficits.
  • The findings suggest BC tasks, requiring complex relative timing, are more vulnerable to APD than WC tasks.