Related Experiment Videos
Anismus in patients with normal and slow transit constipation.
R Miller1, G S Duthie, D C Bartolo
1Department of Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, UK.
The British Journal of Surgery
|June 1, 1991
Summary
This study found no differences in anorectal function between patients with slow or normal whole gut transit times. This suggests slow transit constipation may be a primary colonic motility disorder, not related to pelvic floor dysfunction.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Colorectal Surgery
- Physiology
Background:
- Intractable constipation presents with variable whole gut transit times.
- Anismus, or pelvic floor dysfunction, has been hypothesized as a cause for slow transit.
- Understanding anorectal function is key to differentiating constipation subtypes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate differences in anorectal function, specifically anismus, in patients with slow versus normal whole gut transit times.
- To determine if anorectal dysfunction contributes to slow transit constipation.
- To clarify the role of electromyography in diagnosing functional anismus.
Main Methods:
- Studied 24 patients with intractable constipation (13 slow transit, 11 normal transit).
- Utilized videoproctography with synchronous sphincteric electromyography and anorectal manometry.
- Assessed pelvic floor contraction during defecation and rectal evacuation capacity.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in anorectal function were observed between slow and normal transit groups.
- Electromyographic evidence of anismus did not correlate with rectal evacuation ability or obstructed defecation symptoms.
- Videoproctography did not reveal differences in rectal evacuation between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Slow transit constipation is likely a primary disorder of colonic motility, not secondary to anorectal functional abnormalities.
- Electromyography findings of anismus alone are insufficient for diagnosis; they must be correlated with proctographic evidence of incomplete rectal evacuation.
- Functional anismus requires confirmation through objective measures of rectal emptying, not solely based on electromyography.