Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Auditory Pathway

Auditory Pathway

Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking the...

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by identifying...

Auditory Perception

Auditory Perception

The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the cochlea, a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Rubber voice illusion exposed neural correlates of voice perception and vocal adaptation across the continuum of psychosis.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2022

Same author

Regulation of auditory plasticity during critical periods and following hearing loss.

Hearing research·2020

Same author

Automated extraction of auditory brainstem response latencies and amplitudes by means of non-linear curve registration.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2020

Same author

Noise-Induced Changes of the Auditory Brainstem Response to Speech-a Measure of Neural Desynchronisation?

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2020

Same author

Corrigendum: Linear mixed-effects models for within-participant psychology experiments: an introductory tutorial and free, graphical user interface (LMMgui).

Frontiers in psychology·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Evidence for opponent-channel coding of interaural time differences in human auditory cortex.

David A Magezi¹, Katrin Krumbholz

¹MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.

Journal of Neurophysiology

|August 13, 2010

Summary

Human sound localization relies on interaural time differences (ITDs). This study found that ITDs are processed using an opponent-channel model, not a topographic one, suggesting a nontopographic neural code for sound.

More Related Videos

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Published on: October 22, 2015

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Published on: October 22, 2015

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Auditory Perception
Psychoacoustics

Background:

Horizontal sound localization in humans primarily uses interaural time differences (ITDs) for low frequencies.
The traditional topographic (rate-place) model, where neurons are parametrically tuned to ITDs, is established in owls but debated in mammals.
Recent findings suggest a nontopographic opponent-channel model for ITDs in small-headed species.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether humans utilize a topographic or nontopographic (opponent-channel) model for processing interaural time differences (ITDs).
To differentiate between the predictive outcomes of the topographic and opponent-channel models regarding neural responses to ITD changes.

Main Methods:

Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to measure brain responses to abrupt changes in ITDs of continuous sounds.
Evoked responses were analyzed for 'outward' ITD changes (away from midline) and 'inward' ITD changes (toward midline).
Response magnitudes were compared between outward and inward ITD change conditions to test model predictions.

Main Results:

Response magnitudes to outward ITD changes were significantly larger than those to inward ITD changes.
These findings strongly support the predictions of the opponent-channel model.
The results contradict the predictions of the topographic model, which would expect similar response sizes for both conditions.

Conclusions:

The human auditory system likely codes interaural time differences (ITDs) via a nontopographic, opponent-channel mechanism.
This suggests that ITD-sensitive neurons are broadly tuned to contralateral auditory hemifields, rather than exhibiting parametric tuning.
The findings challenge the universal applicability of the topographic model for ITD processing across different species.