Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

An Approach to Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected aortic dissection
Qing-kun Fan1, Wen-wu Wang, Zhen-lu Zhang
1Center of Clinical Laboratory, Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital, Wuhan, P.R. China. fanqingkun@hotmail.com
Insights
Plasma D-dimer shows high sensitivity for diagnosing aortic dissection (AD), but cannot rule it out completely. Further imaging is needed for patients with negative D-dimer results.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
- Diagnostic Markers
Background:
- Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening condition requiring rapid diagnosis.
- Plasma D-dimer is a potential biomarker for excluding AD, but its utility requires further evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic accuracy of plasma D-dimer for the exclusion of suspected aortic dissection (AD).
Main Methods:
- Enrolled 260 patients with suspected AD, including acute AD, chronic AD, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), pulmonary embolism (PE), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina (UA).
- Performed D-dimer testing on all patients upon admission using Roche Diagnostics assays.
Main Results:
- D-dimer levels were significantly elevated in acute AD and chronic AD groups compared to AMI, NSTEMI, and UA groups (p=0.000).
- D-dimer levels were not significantly different between AD and PE groups.
- One acute AD patient (0.8%) presented with a low D-dimer value, later confirmed as intramural hematoma via CT.
Conclusions:
- Plasma D-dimer demonstrates high sensitivity (up to 99.2%) for suspected AD, suggesting its potential as a diagnostic marker.
- D-dimer testing alone cannot achieve 100% sensitivity for AD diagnosis.
- Imaging modalities remain essential for diagnosing suspected AD in patients with negative D-dimer results.
Background:
The goal of this study was to evaluate plasma D-dimer as a diagnostic marker for exclusion of suspected aortic dissection (AD).
Methods:
Two-hundred and sixty suspected AD patients were enrolled, including acute AD, n=107; chronic AD, n=17; acute myocardial infarction (AMI), n=70; pulmonary embolism (PE), n=18; non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), n=28; and unstable angina (UA), n=20. All patients had D-dimer testing performed (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) immediately following admission.
Results:
The D-dimer concentrations in both the acute AD group [median: 3.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.43-4.50 μg/mL] and chronic AD group (median: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.36-3.81 μg/mL) were significantly higher than those in patients in the AMI, NSTEMI and UA groups (p=0.000), but not when compared to the PE group. One (0.8%) patient was identified in the acute AD group who presented with a low D-dimer value (0.04 μg/mL), indicating the existence of intramural hematoma as demonstrated by CT.
Conclusions:
D-dimer may be used as a potential marker for suspected AD, with high sensitivity of up to 99.2% (1/124). Regardless of the cut-off threshold selected, the sensitivity of D-dimer was unable to reach 100%. Further examinations, including imaging technology, were necessary to diagnose the suspected AD patients who had negative D-dimer result.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
