Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

08:08
Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
Published on: April 1, 2016
Lexicality and frequency in specific language impairment: accuracy and error data from two nonword repetition tests
Gary Jones1, Marco Tamburelli, Sarah E Watson
1Division of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Chaucer Building, Nottingham NG1 5LT, United Kingdom. gary.jones@ntu.ac.uk
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR
|August 14, 2010
Summary
Children with specific language impairment (SLI) struggle with low-lexicality nonwords, indicating a phonological processing deficit. Their performance suggests long-term phonological knowledge influences nonword interpretation.
Area of Science:
- Linguistics
- Developmental Psychology
- Speech and Language Pathology
Background:
- Specific language impairment (SLI) is often linked to deficits in phonological working memory or phonological processing.
- Understanding the underlying mechanisms of SLI is crucial for effective intervention strategies.
- Nonword repetition tasks are valuable tools for assessing phonological skills in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To differentiate between phonological working memory and phonological processing deficits as explanations for SLI.
- To investigate the role of lexicality and phonotactic frequency in nonword repetition in children with SLI.
- To compare the nonword repetition performance of children with SLI and typically developing (TD) children.
Main Methods:
- Eighteen children with SLI and 18 TD children participated in the study.
- Participants completed language and nonverbal intelligence assessments.
- Two nonword repetition tests, varying in lexicality and frequency, were administered.
Main Results:
- Children with SLI showed impairments in repeating low-lexicality nonwords but were unimpaired with high-lexicality nonwords.
- Repetition accuracy for low-lexicality nonwords improved with higher phonotactic frequency of phoneme sequences.
- Error patterns in children with SLI were similar to TD children, suggesting lexical substitution rather than pure phonological errors.
Conclusions:
- The findings support a phonological processing deficit in SLI, mediated by lexical and sublexical knowledge.
- Nonword interpretation relies on existing long-term phonological knowledge.
- While phonological processing is key, a comprehensive explanation of SLI likely involves multiple factors.
Related Concept Videos
Interference and Decay
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Language and Cognition
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.

