Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
Published on: March 8, 2018
Convergent validity of the Defense Mechanisms Manual and the Defensive Functioning Scale
John H Porcerelli1, Rosemary Cogan, Ray Kamoo
1Department of Family Medicine & Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 1135 W. University Drive, Rochester Hills, MI 48307-1831, USA. jporcer@med.wayne.edu
Abstract:
We examined the convergent validity of Cramer's Defense Mechanisms Manual (DMM; Cramer, 1991b) by comparing it to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) Defensive Functioning Scale (DFS). A total of 60 low income urban women from a primary care medical facility responded to four Thematic Apperception Test (TAT; Murray, 1943) cards and an interview of early memories and descriptions of significant others. We scored the TAT narratives with the DMM, and we coded the interview narratives with the DFS. DMM Denial and Projection scales were negatively correlated with the DFS Overall Defensive Functioning scale (r = -.28, p< .01 and r = -.22, p< .10, respectively) and were positively correlated with a DFS pathological composite score (r = .36, p< .01 and r = .32, p< .05, respectively). These findings support the convergent validity of the DMM Denial and Projection scales.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
