Echocardiography, dyssynchrony, and the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Cheuk-Man Yu1, John E Sanderson, John Gorcsan
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. cmyu@cuhk.edu.hk
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves heart failure, but not all patients benefit. Improved patient selection criteria beyond current guidelines are needed for better outcomes and reduced healthcare costs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an advancement in treating chronic heart failure.
- However, patient response to CRT varies, with some experiencing no benefit or even worsening of their condition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review arguments for improved patient selection criteria for CRT beyond current guidelines.
- To explore methodologies for detecting cardiac dyssynchrony, the fundamental mechanism of CRT.
- To discuss other factors influencing CRT outcomes and the economic implications of inappropriate implantation.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of clinical and economic arguments for enhanced CRT selection.
- Review of methodologies for detecting cardiac dyssynchrony.
- Discussion of factors like lead position, myocardial damage, pacemaker optimization, and clinical expertise.
Main Results:
- Current guidelines for CRT patient selection may not be optimal.
- Improved selection could reduce costs and improve patient outcomes.
- Detecting dyssynchrony and considering other factors are crucial for successful CRT.
Conclusions:
- There is a clear need to refine patient selection criteria for CRT.
- Current guidelines for CRT implantation require improvement to maximize benefits and minimize risks.
- A multidisciplinary approach considering dyssynchrony, lead placement, and patient-specific factors is essential.
Abstract:
Biventricular pacing or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been a considerable advance in the therapy of chronic heart failure. However, it is clear that not all patients benefit either in terms of symptoms or cardiac function, and some may be worsened by CRT. In this review, we consider the arguments, both clinical and economical, in favour of improved selection of patients for CRT other than those in current guidelines. It also seems clear that the fundamental mechanism of CRT is correction of dyssynchrony, and we review the various methodologies available to detect dyssynchrony. Other factors are probably also important in determining outcomes such as lead position, the extent and form of myocardial damage, optimizing pacemaker performance, and clinical expertise. The potential costs of inappropriate CRT implantation are high to our patients and to the health economy, and it behooves the cardiology community to develop better selection criteria. The current guidelines can and should be improved.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion, evaluates...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for diagnosing...
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

