In vitro comparisons of two antimicrobial intravenous connectors

Cynthia Chernecky1, Jennifer Waller

  • 1Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, USA. cchernecky@mail.mcg.edu

Insights

Antimicrobial needleless connectors can harbor bacteria, increasing infection risk. The RyMed-7001(®) demonstrated the lowest bacterial colonization, unlike the Baxter V-Link™, highlighting the importance of connector design in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI).

Area of Science:

  • Infection Control
  • Medical Device Technology
  • Microbiology

Background:

  • Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) are a significant healthcare concern, with intraluminal contamination being a primary source.
  • Organism migration through the fluid pathway of needleless connectors can lead to CR-BSI within 24 hours.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the in vitro bacterial colonization of different needleless connectors.
  • To determine which antimicrobial needleless connector exhibited the least bacterial colony-forming units (CFUs).
  • To compare antimicrobial connector performance against a leading nonantimicrobial connector.

Main Methods:

  • An independent laboratory conducted in vitro testing on two antimicrobial (Baxter V-Link™, RyMed-7001 Nano(®)) and one nonantimicrobial (RyMed-5001) connector.
  • Twenty connectors of each type were tested under identical laboratory conditions over four days, using four different organisms and three controls.

Main Results:

  • The Baxter V-Link™ consistently produced 2.0 to 8.8 times more bacteria than both the RyMed-5001(®) and RyMed-7001(®) connectors.
  • The RyMed-7001(®) demonstrated no consistent bacterial presence, while the Baxter V-Link™ showed the highest and most consistent bacterial counts (13,675 CFUs) over the study period.

Conclusions:

  • Connector design, including technological features and antimicrobial coating methods, significantly impacts bacterial colonization.
  • Healthcare professionals and researchers should consider these factors when selecting and evaluating needleless connectors to mitigate CR-BSI risks.