Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

RNA-seq

RNA-seq

RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases.
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while microarray-based...

Ribosome Profiling

Ribosome Profiling

Ribosome profiling or ribo-sequencing is a deep sequencing technique that produces a snapshot of active translation in a cell. It selectively sequences the mRNAs protected by ribosomes to get an insight into a cell’s translation landscape at any given point in time.
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique helps...

Sanger Sequencing

Sanger Sequencing

DNA sequencing is a fundamental technique that is routinely used in the biological sciences. This method can be applied to a range of questions at different scales - from the sequencing of a cloned DNA fragment or the study of a mutation in a gene up to whole-genome sequencing. However, despite the widespread use of sequencing today, it was not until 1977 that Fredrick Sanger and his collaborators developed the chain-termination method to decode DNA sequences. It relies on the separation of a...

Next-generation Sequencing

Next-generation Sequencing

The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

An anaerobic pathogen rewires host metabolism to fuel oxidative growth in the inflamed gut.

Cell·2026

Same author

Direct genetic transformation bypasses tumor-associated DNA methylation alterations.

Genome biology·2025

Same author

An Anaerobic Pathogen Rewires Host Metabolism to Fuel Oxidative Growth in the Inflamed Gut.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same author

Establishing Methods to Monitor Influenza (A)H5N1 Virus in Dairy Cattle Milk, Massachusetts, USA.

Emerging infectious diseases·2025

Same author

Establishing methods to monitor H5N1 influenza virus in dairy cattle milk.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2024

Same author

Distinct Escherichia coli transcriptional profiles in the guts of recurrent UTI sufferers revealed by pangenome hybrid selection.

Nature communications·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Comparative RNA Structure Analysis of Nascent and Mature Transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Comparative RNA Structure Analysis of Nascent and Mature Transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: February 27, 2026

Comprehensive comparative analysis of strand-specific RNA sequencing methods.

Joshua Z Levin¹, Moran Yassour, Xian Adiconis

¹Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. jlevin@broadinstitute.org

|August 17, 2010

Summary

Comparing RNA sequencing methods, this study found dUTP second-strand marking and Illumina RNA ligation to be leading protocols for accurate transcript discovery and expression profiling.

More Related Videos

AQRNA-seq for Quantifying Small RNAs

AQRNA-seq for Quantifying Small RNAs

Published on: February 2, 2024

Targeted RNA Sequencing Assay to Characterize Gene Expression and Genomic Alterations

Targeted RNA Sequencing Assay to Characterize Gene Expression and Genomic Alterations

Published on: August 4, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Comparative RNA Structure Analysis of Nascent and Mature Transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Comparative RNA Structure Analysis of Nascent and Mature Transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: February 27, 2026

AQRNA-seq for Quantifying Small RNAs

AQRNA-seq for Quantifying Small RNAs

Published on: February 2, 2024

Targeted RNA Sequencing Assay to Characterize Gene Expression and Genomic Alterations

Targeted RNA Sequencing Assay to Characterize Gene Expression and Genomic Alterations

Published on: August 4, 2016

Area of Science:

Molecular Biology
Bioinformatics
Genomics

Background:

Strand-specific RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is crucial for transcript discovery, genome annotation, and expression profiling.
Multiple RNA-seq library preparation methods exist, but a consensus on the best approach is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a computational pipeline for comparing RNA-seq library quality metrics.
To evaluate and compare seven different strand-specific RNA-seq library construction protocols.

Main Methods:

Development of a comprehensive computational pipeline for assessing RNA-seq library quality.
Comparative analysis of seven library construction protocols using the Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptome as a benchmark.
Evaluation of metrics including strand specificity, library complexity, coverage, annotation agreement, and expression profiling accuracy.

Main Results:

Significant variations were observed among the seven tested RNA-seq protocols in terms of strand specificity, library complexity, coverage, and accuracy.
The dUTP second-strand marking and Illumina RNA ligation methods were identified as the leading protocols.
Paired-end sequencing particularly benefits the dUTP second-strand marking method.

Conclusions:

The developed computational pipeline provides a benchmark for assessing RNA-seq protocols.
The dUTP second-strand marking and Illumina RNA ligation methods are recommended for strand-specific RNA-seq.
The pipeline is adaptable for evaluating future RNA-seq protocols in various organisms.