Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.7K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.7K
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

14.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
14.3K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.3K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

43.3K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
43.3K
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

36.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
36.6K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

38.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
38.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The experiences and perceptions of personhood for people living with dementia: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol.

HRB open research·2020
Same author

Personhood and Dementia Care: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis of the Perspectives of People With Dementia.

The Gerontologist·2019
Same author

Older Women's Experiences of Aging and Health: An Interpretive Phenomenological Study.

Gerontology & geriatric medicine·2019
Same author

Telling a 'good or white lie': The views of people living with dementia and their carers.

Dementia (London, England)·2019
Same author

The impact of life story work on person-centred care for people with dementia living in long-stay care settings in Ireland.

Dementia (London, England)·2018
Same author

Nurses' knowledge of pain and its management in older people.

Nursing older people·2016
Same journal

Using photo elicitation in focused ethnography with adolescents: methodological lessons from an urban greenspace study.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

Adapting interpretative phenomenological analysis: a multilayered perspectival design for health research.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

An art-based mixed-methods study exploring children's environmental preferences in home-based nursing research.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis in clinical nursing research.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

Integrating the experience sampling method and intersectionality to capture lived realities in nursing research.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

Fraudulent qualitative study participants: experiences of two nurse researchers.

Nurse researcher·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm
07:26

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm

Published on: May 4, 2020

3.8K

Choosing between Glaser and Strauss: an example.

Adeline Cooney1

  • 1School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway.

Nurse Researcher
|August 18, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study clarifies the Glaser-Strauss debate in grounded theory methodology. It demonstrates how choosing between Glaserian and Straussian approaches impacts research on older adults

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.5K
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm
07:26

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm

Published on: May 4, 2020

3.8K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.5K
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.2K

Area of Science:

  • Qualitative Research Methodology
  • Gerontology
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Grounded theory methodology offers distinct approaches, notably the Glaserian and Straussian traditions.
  • The decision-making process for selecting between these grounded theory methodologies is often complex and underexplored.
  • Understanding these methodological nuances is crucial for rigorous qualitative research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the Glaser-Strauss debate within grounded theory.
  • To examine the practical implications of choosing between Glaserian and Straussian grounded theory.
  • To illustrate this methodological decision using a case study on older adults' sense of home in residential settings.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of Glaserian and Straussian grounded theory principles.
  • Application of grounded theory to a qualitative study exploring 'sense of home' in older adults.
  • Case study analysis of research decision-making in qualitative inquiry.

Main Results:

  • The choice between Glaserian and Straussian grounded theory influences data analysis and theoretical development.
  • The study highlights how different methodological pathways can shape findings regarding older adults' experiences.
  • Specific differences in data interpretation emerged based on the chosen grounded theory approach.

Conclusions:

  • The Glaser-Strauss debate has significant, practical consequences for qualitative research design and execution.
  • Researchers must carefully consider the philosophical underpinnings of Glaserian versus Straussian grounded theory.
  • Methodological transparency in reporting the chosen grounded theory approach is essential for research credibility.