Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Derivatization of Protein Crystals with I3C using Random Microseed Matrix Screening
Published on: January 16, 2021
Comparing efficiencies of genetic and minima hopping algorithms for crystal structure prediction
Min Ji1, Cai-Zhuang Wang, Kai-Ming Ho
1Ames Laboratory, US DOE and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA.
Abstract:
In this work several crystal structure prediction problems which have been studied by first-principles evolutionary algorithms recently are revisited. We increased the system size to see how the search efficiency changes with respect to problem size. We find that the relative performance and underlying mechanism of genetic algorithms in crystal structure searches for Al(x)Sc(1-x) strongly depend on the system composition as well as the size of the problem. Because of this strong dependence, caution should be taken in generalizing performance comparison from one problem to another even though they may appear to be similar. We also investigate the performance of the search algorithm for crystal structure prediction of boron with and without a priori knowledge of the lattice vectors. The results show that the degree of difficulty increases dramatically if the lattice vectors of the crystal are allowed to vary during the search. Comparison of the minima hopping algorithm with the genetic algorithm at small (<10 atoms) to larger problem sizes is also carried out. At the small sizes we have tested, both methods show comparable efficiency. But at large sizes the genetic algorithm becomes advantageous over minima hopping.
Related Concept Videos
Determination of Crystal Structures
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...

