Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

Switch-specific and general preparation map onto different ERP components in a task-switching paradigm.

Frini Karayanidis¹, Alexander Provost, Scott Brown

¹Functional Neuroimaging Laboratory, School of Psychology and Centre for Brain and Mental Health Research, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia. frini.karayanidis@newcastle.edu.au

Psychophysiology

|August 20, 2010

Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Adaptive cognitive control in prospective memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same author

Baroreflex Activation Therapy In Heart Failure-the Barostim-Enabled Neurohormonal Intervention for Improving Treatment of Heart Failure (BENEFIT-HF) Trial Rationale and Design.

Journal of cardiac failure·2026

Same author

Positive Bias in Value-Based Decision Making: Neurocognitive Associations with Resilience.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026

Same author

Assessment of student confidence, knowledge, and attitudes after use of interactive computer modules in a university-level cardiovascular physiology course.

Advances in physiology education·2026

Same author

An illustrative guide to expressing cognitive theories using evidence accumulation modelling.

Behavior research methods·2026

Same author

Joint Cognitive Models Reveal Sources of Robust Individual Differences in Conflict Processing.

Computational brain & behavior·2026

The centroparietal positivity (300-400 ms) reflects switch-specific preparation, not general processes. Its amplitude correlates with slower reaction times and increased switch costs in switch trials, indicating task-set reconfiguration.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Electrophysiology

Background:

Task-switching involves cognitive control and preparation.
Event-related potentials (ERPs) offer insights into neural processes during cognitive tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

To determine if the cue-locked centroparietal positivity (300-400 ms) is related to switch-specific or general preparation.
To investigate the relationship between ERP components and reaction time (RT) costs in task switching.

Main Methods:

Analysis of ERP waveforms from switch and repeat trials.
Extraction of ERPs based on reaction time semi-deciles.
Correlation analysis between ERP amplitude and RT switch cost.

Main Results:

Centroparietal positivity amplitude was associated with slower RT and larger RT switch cost for switch trials, but not repeat trials.

More Related Videos

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

A later pre-target negativity (500-600 ms) correlated inversely with RT for both trial types.

Findings support a switch-specific role for the centroparietal positivity.

Conclusions:

The centroparietal positivity (300-400 ms) specifically indexes switch-related preparation processes.
General preparation processes are reflected by a later pre-target negativity (500-600 ms).
This study differentiates neural mechanisms underlying specific and general preparation in task switching.