Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting Illness01:18

Factors Affecting Illness

When a person's physical, emotional, intellectual, social development or spiritual functioning is compromised, this deviation from a healthy normal state is called illness. Illness creates stress that in turn harms individuals. Irritation, anger, denial, hopelessness, and fear are behavioral and emotional changes an individual experiences in the phases of illness. A variety of factors influence a person's health and well-being.
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness, disability,...
Dimensions of Health and Illness01:21

Dimensions of Health and Illness

The factors influencing the health-illness continuum can be internal or external and may or may not be under conscious control. They are related to the following eight human dimensions, and each dimension is interrelated to one other.
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient01:17

Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient

The extended Debye-Hückel equation indicates that the activity coefficient of an ion in an aqueous solution at 25°C depends on three partially interdependent properties: the ionic strength of the solution, the charge of the ion, and the ion size. 
The activity coefficient value for an ion is close to one when the solution has almost zero ionic strength, i.e., when the solution shows close to ideal behavior. As the ionic strength of the solution increases from 0 to 0.1 mol/L, a decrease in the...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using latent class analysis to identify subgroups of postoperative older adults.

SAGE open medicine·2026
Same author

The Value and Challenges of Stakeholder Engagement in Rehabilitation Learning Health Systems: A Qualitative Pilot Study of Rehabilitation Directors.

Learning health systems·2026
Same author

Bridging Perspectives: Guiding the Selection of Patient-Centered Outcomes in Rehabilitation Learning Health Systems.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Emergency Department Visit Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Trial of a Fall Prevention Intervention.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2026
Same author

Home Health Focus: A New Publicly Available Dataset to Study Community-Dwelling Populations Receiving Home Health Services.

Annals of family medicine·2025
Same author

Comparative Effectiveness of Inpatient Rehabilitation Versus Skilled Nursing Facilities for Stroke and Hip Fracture Patients.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Using a Real-Time Locating System to Measure Walking Activity Associated with Wandering Behaviors Among Institutionalized Older Adults
04:13

Using a Real-Time Locating System to Measure Walking Activity Associated with Wandering Behaviors Among Institutionalized Older Adults

Published on: February 8, 2019

Weighted index explained more variance in physical function than an additively scored functional comorbidity scale.

Linda Resnik1, Pedro Gozalo, Dennis L Hart

  • 1Providence VA Medical Center, Department of Community Health, Box G-S121(6), Brown University, Providence, RI 02908, USA. linda_resnik@brown.edu

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|August 20, 2010
PubMed
Summary

The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) and a list of conditions effectively predict functional status. A weighted FCI or condition list is better than an additive FCI for predicting outcomes.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
06:52

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit

Published on: September 30, 2020

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Using a Real-Time Locating System to Measure Walking Activity Associated with Wandering Behaviors Among Institutionalized Older Adults
04:13

Using a Real-Time Locating System to Measure Walking Activity Associated with Wandering Behaviors Among Institutionalized Older Adults

Published on: February 8, 2019

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
06:52

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit

Published on: September 30, 2020

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Rehabilitation medicine
  • Health services research
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) is used to quantify the impact of comorbidities on functional status.
  • Understanding the best method to incorporate comorbidity data is crucial for accurate outcome prediction in rehabilitation.
  • Existing methods for using comorbidity indices may not optimally reflect their impact on functional status.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the association between the Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) and discharge functional status (FS).
  • To assess the impact of the FCI on FS when integrated into comprehensive predictive models.
  • To compare the predictive performance of an additive FCI versus a weighted FCI and a list of specific conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Data were sourced from the Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes, Inc. (FOTO) database, covering patient records from 2006 to 2007.
  • Functional status (FS) was measured using computer-adaptive tests.
  • Linear regression analyses were employed to evaluate the relationship between the FCI and FS, comparing three distinct methods of incorporating functional comorbidities.

Main Results:

  • The association between the FCI and FS varied across different patient groups, with R-squared values ranging from 0.02 to 0.9.
  • Both weighted FCI and a list of conditions demonstrated similar predictive power (R-squared).
  • Incorporating a weighted FCI or a condition list improved the R-squared of crude models more significantly than the additive FCI, particularly for elbow (0.03) and neurological conditions (0.08).

Conclusions:

  • A weighted Functional Comorbidity Index or a comprehensive list of comorbidities is superior to an additive FCI for predicting functional status.
  • These findings suggest that a more nuanced approach to quantifying comorbidity burden improves prediction accuracy in rehabilitation outcomes.