Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Surgical Techniques for Catheter Placement and 5/6 Nephrectomy in Murine Models of Peritoneal Dialysis
Published on: July 19, 2018
The differences of asymmetric dimethylarginine removal by different dialysis treatments
Dong-Liang Zhang1, Jing Liu, Sha Liu
1Department of Nephrology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, PR China.
Background:
Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) as a uremia toxin is accumulated in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Elevated ADMA level has been shown to be predictive of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and all-cause mortality in ESRD. Therefore, we investigated the removal of ADMA by different dialysis treatments.
Methods:
There were 30 each of hemodialysis (HD), hemodiafiltration (HDF), peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, and healthy volunteers enrolled. The ADMA concentrations in serum, urine, and spent dialysate samples were determined. The urine and spent dialysate volumes were recorded. The ADMA removals by urine and spent dialysate in 1 week were calculated and compared among four groups. It was also analyzed for the correlations between the total removal of ADMA in 1 week and the parameters of age, durance of dialysis, glomerular filtration rate, urine volume, urinal ADMA level, spent dialysate volume, and spent dialysate ADMA level.
Results:
The serum levels of ADMA in dialysis patients were much higher than in healthy subjects (0.32 +/- 0.09 micromol/L), and their 1-week total removals of ADMA were much lower than healthy controls (249.21 +/- 57.04 micromol/week) (p-values all were less than 0.01). Among dialysis groups, serum ADMA levels decreased significantly in PD patients compared with HD or HDF patients (1.38 +/- 0.30 micromol/L vs. 1.82 +/- 0.38 micromol/L and 1.63 +/- 0.32 micromol/L, p < 0.01), and the total removal of ADMA diminished remarkably by turns of PD, HDF, and HD groups (47.79 +/- 8.20 micromol/week, 31.79 +/- 8.92 micromol/week, 14.63 +/- 6.53 micromol/week, respectively, p < 0.01). The total removal of ADMA in 1 week was related directly with the spent dialysate concentrations of ADMA, the spent dialysate volume, and the urine volume.
Conclusions:
ADMA was mainly removed by dialysate in dialysis patients. Different dialysis models have different clearance capability on plasma ADMA. PD might be more effective on ADMA removal than HD and HDF, with HDF being more effective than HD.
Related Concept Videos
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
Dialysis
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration