Monitoring does not always count
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Real-Time Monitoring of Neurocritical Patients with Diffuse Optical Spectroscopies
Published on: November 19, 2020
Eve McDonald-Madden1, Peter W J Baxter, Richard A Fuller
1The University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia. eve-mcdonald@csiro.au
Abstract:
The gross under-resourcing of conservation endeavours has placed an increasing emphasis on spending accountability. Increased accountability has led to monitoring forming a central element of conservation programs. Although there is little doubt that information obtained from monitoring can improve management of biodiversity, the cost (in time and/or money) of gaining this knowledge is rarely considered when making decisions about allocation of resources to monitoring. We present a simple framework allowing managers and policy advisors to make decisions about when to invest in monitoring to improve management.
Related Concept Videos
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods

