Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

08:46
Genetic Variant Detection in the CALR gene using High Resolution Melting Analysis
Published on: August 26, 2020
Analysis and interpretation of mixed profiles generated by 34 cycle SGM Plus(®) amplification
Jon H Wetton1, John Lee-Edghill, Emily Archer
1Forensic Science Service, 2960 Trident Court, Birmingham Business Park, Solihull B37 7YN, UK. Jon.Wetton@fss.pnn.police.uk
Forensic Science International. Genetics
|August 24, 2010
Summary
This study validates interpretation rules for mixed short tandem repeat (STR) profiles using 34-cycle polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Trained analysts reliably distinguished major and minor contributors in complex DNA mixtures, confirming rule effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Science
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Standard interpretation rules for 28-cycle PCR analysis of mixed short tandem repeat (STR) profiles exist.
- Low Copy Number (LCN) DNA analysis presents challenges in distinguishing contributors within mixed profiles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability of established 28-cycle PCR interpretation guidelines when applied to 34-cycle PCR profiles.
- To assess the effectiveness of these rules in analyzing mixed STR profiles generated from known donor pairs at various ratios and DNA inputs.
Main Methods:
- 200 DNA mixtures from pairs of known donors (ratios 1:1, 2:1, 5:1) were analyzed using SGM Plus® with total DNA inputs from 1ng to 50pg.
- 35 Forensic Science Service (FSS) reporting officers, trained in LCN interpretation, blindly analyzed duplicate profiles following standard casework procedures.
- Decisions on processing a third aliquot were based on initial duplicate 34-cycle PCR results.
Main Results:
- 49 consensus profiles were successfully resolved into major and minor contributor peaks.
- No minor contributor peaks were incorrectly assigned to a major profile in the final reported results.
- Profiles lacking clear differentiation could be resolved if one contributor's profile (e.g., victim) was known.
Conclusions:
- The interpretation rules for standard 28-cycle SGM Plus analysis are reliable when applied to 34-cycle generated profiles by experienced analysts.
- The study demonstrates the robustness of these interpretation guidelines for complex DNA mixture analysis.
- Successful resolution of major and minor contributors supports the validity of the established rules in forensic casework.

