Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
Conduct Disorder01:28

Conduct Disorder

Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...
Learning Disabilities01:25

Learning Disabilities

Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Uncovering Motivational Profiles Among Academically Resilient Students: A Population-Level Latent Profile Analysis.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

"Okay, So It's Not Me"-The <i>Extra-Fatigue</i> of Formal and Informal Reporting of Sexual Harassment in Academia.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
Same author

The effects of athletes' moral identity on clean sport behavior intentions: a cross-national study of the mediating role of moral disengagement and self-efficacy.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2026
Same author

Correction: The effects of athletes' moral identity on clean sport behavior intentions: a cross-national study of the mediating role of moral disengagement and self-efficacy.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2026
Same author

Older LGB Adults and Sport-Related Contexts: Discrimination, Evolving Context, Motivations, and Attitudes Toward LGBTQ+ Sports Associations.

Journal of homosexuality·2026
Same author

Adopting the Mediterranean Diet: Motivational and Socio-Cognitive Processes in Young Adults.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

Young novice driver subtypes: relationship to driving violations, errors and lapses.

Fabio Lucidi1, Anna Maria Giannini, Roberto Sgalla

  • 1Department of Development and Socialization Processes Psychology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Rome, Italy. fabio.lucidi@uniorma1.it

Accident; Analysis and Prevention
|August 24, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Researchers identified three distinct driver subtypes among young Italian drivers: risky, worried, and careful. These groups differ in personality traits, driving behaviors, and accident involvement, informing targeted safety interventions.

More Related Videos

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
11:12

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
11:12

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Traffic Safety
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Young, novice drivers are a high-risk group for traffic accidents.
  • Understanding driver subtypes based on personality is crucial for developing effective safety interventions.
  • Previous research has not fully integrated personality traits with driving behaviors and locus of control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify distinct driver subtypes in a large sample of young Italian drivers.
  • To analyze the relationship between personality traits, driving behaviors, and accident involvement.
  • To differentiate between deliberate rule-breaking and unintentional driving errors.

Main Methods:

  • Cluster analysis of self-reported personality traits (driving anger, anxiety, hostility, excitement-seeking, altruism, normlessness, locus of control).
  • Utilized the Manchester Driver Behavior Questionnaire to assess driving violations, errors, and lapses.
  • Sample included 1008 Italian high school students aged 18-23 with valid driver's licenses.

Main Results:

  • Three driver subgroups were identified: risky, worried, and careful drivers.
  • These subgroups significantly differed in accident involvement, safety attitudes, risk perception, and driving behaviors (violations, errors, lapses).
  • Inclusion of driving locus of control enhanced the cluster solution.

Conclusions:

  • Personality traits and locus of control effectively differentiate young driver subtypes.
  • Distinguishing between intentional violations and unintentional errors is key to understanding subgroup behavior.
  • Findings support the development of targeted interventions to improve road safety for novice drivers.