Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

A Periprosthetic Joint Candida albicans Infection Model in Mouse
Published on: February 2, 2024
Outcome of orthopedic implant infections due to different staphylococci
Dorota Teterycz1, Tristan Ferry, Daniel Lew
1Orthopedic Surgery Service, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 24 Rue Micheli-du-Crest, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Background:
Comparisons of different staphylococci in orthopedic implant infections have rarely been reported. In this study we assessed total joint arthroplasty infections and other orthopedic implant infections due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS).
Methods:
This was a retrospective study performed at the Geneva University Hospitals for the period January 1996 to June 2008.
Results:
There were 44 infections due to MRSA, 58 due to MSSA, and 61 due to CoNS. Overall cure was achieved in 57% (25/44) of MRSA infections, 72% (42/58) of MSSA infections, and 82% (50/61) of CoNS infections, after a minimum follow-up of 1 year. In the subgroup of arthroplasty infections only, cure was achieved in 39% (7/18) of MRSA, 60% (15/25) of MSSA, and 77% (30/39) of CoNS episodes. In multivariate analysis, arthroplasty (odds ratio (OR) 0.2, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.1-0.6) and MRSA infections (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9) were inversely associated with overall cure for all implants. CoNS infection (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-8.0) and the insertion of a new implant (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.6-13.1) were associated with higher cure results. Methicillin resistance, immunosuppression, sex, age, duration of antibiotic therapy, one-stage revision, rifampin use, and total number of surgical interventions did not influence cure. MRSA-infected patients had more post-infection sequelae than patients with MSSA or CoNS (Chi-square test 13/44 vs. 93/119, OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.3-8.9, p=0.004).
Conclusions:
In orthopedic implant infections, S. aureus is more virulent than CoNS. MRSA has the worst outcome and CoNS the best.
Insights
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections lead to worse outcomes than coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) in orthopedic implant infections. CoNS infections show the best cure rates, while MRSA infections have the poorest outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Infectious Diseases
- Microbiology
Background:
- Orthopedic implant infections are a significant clinical challenge.
- Comparisons between different staphylococcal species in these infections are limited.
- This study focuses on infections caused by methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of orthopedic implant infections caused by MSSA, MRSA, and CoNS.
- To identify factors influencing cure rates in these infections.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study conducted at Geneva University Hospitals from January 1996 to June 2008.
- Involved analysis of 44 MRSA, 58 MSSA, and 61 CoNS orthopedic implant infections.
- Multivariate analysis was used to determine factors associated with cure.
Main Results:
- Overall cure rates were 57% for MRSA, 72% for MSSA, and 82% for CoNS.
- In arthroplasty infections specifically, cure rates were 39% (MRSA), 60% (MSSA), and 77% (CoNS).
- MRSA infections and arthroplasty were inversely associated with cure, while CoNS infections and new implant insertion were associated with higher cure rates. MRSA patients experienced more sequelae.
Conclusions:
- Staphylococcus aureus, particularly MRSA, is more virulent than CoNS in orthopedic implant infections.
- MRSA infections are associated with the worst outcomes, while CoNS infections have the most favorable outcomes.
- CoNS infections and new implant insertion correlate with better treatment success.
Related Concept Videos
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Healthcare Associated Infections I: Iatrogenic, Exogenic and Endogenic
HAIs significantly increase the cost of health care. Extended stays in healthcare institutions, increased disability, increased costs of medications, including specialized antibiotics, and prolonged recovery times add to the patient's expenses and the healthcare institution and funding bodies. Common...
Bacterial Signaling
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin create...
