Related Experiment Videos

Extra-anatomical grafting for aorto-occlusive disease: the outcome in 133 procedures

H Schroe1, A Nevelsteen, R Suy

  • 1Department of Vascular Surgery, U.Z. Gasthuisberg, Leuven.

Acta Chirurgica Belgica
|September 1, 1990
PubMed

Insights

Extra-anatomical bypass grafts for aorto-iliac occlusive disease show lower patency and limb salvage rates than direct grafting. Cross-over grafts are suitable for unilateral disease, while axillofemoral grafts are best for high-risk limb salvage.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) necessitates surgical intervention.
  • Extra-anatomical bypass grafting offers an alternative when direct reconstruction is not feasible.
  • Understanding the outcomes of different extra-anatomical bypass techniques is crucial for patient selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the outcomes of extra-anatomical bypass grafts for AIOD.
  • To compare the efficacy of cross-over, axillofemoral, and axillobifemoral grafts.
  • To determine the long-term patency and limb salvage rates.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 133 extra-anatomical grafts (1978-1988).
  • Graft types included cross-over, axillofemoral, and axillobifemoral.
  • Indications: acute ischemia, claudication, and limb salvage.
  • Follow-up averaged 32 months.

Main Results:

  • Perioperative mortality was 10.4%.
  • 3-year patency rates: 78% (cross-over) and 49% (axillofemoral).
  • 3-year limb salvage rates: 89% (cross-over) and 75% (axillofemoral).
  • Cardiovascular complications accounted for 54% of late deaths.

Conclusions:

  • Extra-anatomical grafts have less favorable outcomes than direct aortofemoral grafting.
  • Cross-over grafts are recommended for unilateral AIOD.
  • Axillofemoral grafts should be reserved for high-risk limb salvage procedures.

Related Concept Videos