Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Ex Vivo Intestinal Sacs to Assess Mucosal Permeability in Models of Gastrointestinal Disease
Published on: February 9, 2016
Beneficial effects of cathepsin inhibition to prevent chemotherapy-induced intestinal mucositis
I Alamir1, N Boukhettala, M Aziz
1Institute for Biomedical Research and European Institute for Peptide Research, Rouen University, France.
Abstract:
One of the main secondary toxic side effects of anti-mitotic agents used to treat cancer patients is intestinal mucositis. Previous data showed that cathepsin D activity, contributing to the proteolytic lysosomal pathway, is up-regulated during intestinal mucositis in rats. At the same time, cathepsin inhibition limits intestinal damage in animal models of inflammatory bowel diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of cathepsin inhibition on methotrexate-induced mucositis in rats. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received saline solution subcutaneously as the control group or 2·5 mg/kg of methotrexate for 3 days (D0-D2). From D0 to D3 methotrexate-treated rats also received intraperitoneal injections of pepstatin A, a specific inhibitor of cathepsin D or E64, an inhibitor of cathepsins B, H and L, or vehicle. Rats were euthanized at D4 and jejunal samples were collected. Body weight and food intake were partially preserved in rats receiving E64 compared with rats receiving vehicle or pepstatin A. Cathepsin D activity, used as a marker of lysosomal pathway, was reduced both in E64 and pepstatin-treated rats. However, villus atrophy and intestinal damage observed in methotrexate-treated rats were restored in rats receiving E64 but not in rats receiving pepstatin A. The intramucosal concentration of proinflammatory cytokines, interleukin-1β and cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant (CINC)-2, was markedly increased in methotrexate-treated rats receiving vehicle or pepstatin A but not after E64 treatment. In conclusion, a large broad inhibition of cathepsins could represent a new potential target to limit the severity of chemotherapy-induced mucositis as opposed to the inhibition of cathepsin D alone.
More Related Videos
07:05Important Endpoints and Proliferative Markers to Assess Small Intestinal Injury and Adaptation using a Mouse Model of Chemotherapy-Induced Mucositis
Published on: May 12, 2019
08:58Analyzing Beneficial Effects of Nutritional Supplements on Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Functions During Experimental Colitis
Published on: January 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Sucralfate as Mucosal Protective Agents
In this scenario, mucosal protective agents like sucralfate play an essential role. Sucralfate, a complex of sulfated sucrose and aluminum hydroxide, demonstrates its usefulness in acidic conditions,...
Drugs that Stabilize Microtubules
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Prostaglandin Analogs as Mucosal Protective Agents
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can induce peptic ulcers by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, decreasing...
Drugs that Destabilize Microtubules