Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Isolation and Quantification of Botulinum Neurotoxin From Complex Matrices Using the BoTest Matrix Assays
Published on: March 3, 2014
Meta-analysis of neutralizing antibody conversion with onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) across multiple indications
Markus Naumann1, Alastair Carruthers, Jean Carruthers
1Department of Neurology, Klinikum Augsburg Neurologische Klinik, Augsburg, Germany. markus.naumann@klinikum-augsburg.de
Abstract:
This meta-analysis evaluated the frequency of neutralizing antibody (nAb) conversion with onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®; Allergan) across five studied indications. The analysis was based on large, controlled or prospective, open-label trials (durations 4 months to ≥2 years). Serum samples were analyzed for nAbs using the Mouse Protection Assay. Subjects who were antibody negative at baseline and had at least one analyzable postbaseline antibody assay result were included. The 16 clinical studies included 3,006 subjects; of these, 2,240 met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. Subjects received 1-15 treatments (mean 3.8 treatments) with onabotulinumtoxinA. Total doses per treatment cycle ranged from 10 or 20 units in glabellar lines to 20-500 units in cervical dystonia. The numbers of subjects who converted from an antibody-negative status at baseline to antibody-positive status at any post-treatment time point were: cervical dystonia 4/312 (1.28%), glabellar lines 2/718 (0.28%), overactive bladder 0/22 (0%), post-stroke spasticity 1/317 (0.32%), and primary axillary hyperhidrosis 4/871 (0.46%). Across all indications, 11/2,240 subjects (0.49%) converted from antibody negative at baseline to positive at one or more post-treatment time points, but only three subjects became clinically unresponsive to onabotulinumtoxinA at some point following a positive assay. Based on these large trials, the frequency of antibody conversion after onabotulinumtoxinA treatment is very low, and infrequently leads to loss of efficacy. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society.
Insights
The frequency of neutralizing antibody conversion after onabotulinumtoxinA treatment is very low across all indications. This antibody conversion infrequently leads to a loss of treatment efficacy, ensuring continued effectiveness for patients.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- OnabotulinumtoxinA is widely used for various medical indications.
- The development of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) can potentially reduce treatment efficacy.
- Understanding nAb conversion frequency is crucial for assessing long-term treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the frequency of nAb conversion in patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA.
- To assess the impact of nAb conversion on treatment efficacy across different indications.
Main Methods:
- Meta-analysis of 16 controlled or prospective, open-label clinical trials.
- Inclusion of 2,240 subjects who were antibody-negative at baseline.
- Analysis of serum samples for nAbs using the Mouse Protection Assay post-treatment.
Main Results:
- Overall nAb conversion rate was 0.49% (11/2,240 subjects) across all indications.
- Specific conversion rates varied by indication: cervical dystonia (1.28%), glabellar lines (0.28%), overactive bladder (0%), post-stroke spasticity (0.32%), and primary axillary hyperhidrosis (0.46%).
- Only three subjects experienced clinical unresponsiveness following a positive nAb assay.
Conclusions:
- The frequency of nAb conversion following onabotulinumtoxinA treatment is very low.
- Antibody conversion infrequently results in a loss of treatment efficacy.
- OnabotulinumtoxinA demonstrates a favorable safety and efficacy profile regarding antibody formation.
Related Concept Videos
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Botulism
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
