Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceived physical exertion in senior workers performing heavy manual tasks.

Annals of work exposures and health·2026
Same author

Is asymmetric upper trapezius muscle activation during work associated with neck pain? A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Trunk and upper arm postures and movements among older workers in physically demanding occupations.

Annals of work exposures and health·2026
Same author

Standardizing upper arm movement definitions across observational and sensor-based methods: A Delphi consensus study among European ergonomics experts.

Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health·2026
Same author

Are There Sex Differences in Wrist Velocity and Forearm Muscle Activity When Performing Identical Hand-Intensive Work Tasks?

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Effects of prismatic loupes on surgeons' intraoperative physical workload and musculoskeletal discomfort in operating room.

Ergonomics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2026

A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation
11:06

A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation

Published on: April 12, 2016

Head movements during two computer work tasks assessed by accelerometry.

Eva Bernmark1, Mikael Forsman, Christina Wiktorin

  • 1Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. eva.bernmark@ki.se

Applied Ergonomics
|August 27, 2010
PubMed
Summary

A triaxial accelerometer can detect subtle differences in head movements during similar computer tasks. Even a simulated uniaxial accelerometer can identify head acceleration variations, aiding in ergonomic assessments.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Kinematics of Daily Living Movements with Motion Capture Systems in Virtual Reality
08:45

Measuring the Kinematics of Daily Living Movements with Motion Capture Systems in Virtual Reality

Published on: April 5, 2018

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
10:28

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2026

A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation
11:06

A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation

Published on: April 12, 2016

Measuring the Kinematics of Daily Living Movements with Motion Capture Systems in Virtual Reality
08:45

Measuring the Kinematics of Daily Living Movements with Motion Capture Systems in Virtual Reality

Published on: April 5, 2018

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
10:28

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Ergonomics
  • Biomechanics
  • Occupational Health

Background:

  • Computer work tasks often appear similar but can involve different physical demands.
  • Assessing subtle head movements is crucial for understanding neck strain and work-related musculoskeletal disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if a triaxial accelerometer can differentiate head inclinations and accelerations between two similar computer tasks.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a simulated uniaxial accelerometer in detecting head acceleration differences.

Main Methods:

  • Ten subjects performed two document-management tasks (fully electronic vs. paper-assisted) while wearing a triaxial accelerometer.
  • Head movements, including inclinations and accelerations, were recorded during task performance.
  • Data from the triaxial system were analyzed to identify differences between tasks.

Main Results:

  • The triaxial accelerometer successfully discriminated between tasks based on head inclination range and acceleration, particularly for small movements.
  • A significant difference in head acceleration was also detected using a simulated uniaxial accelerometer.
  • These findings highlight the sensitivity of accelerometers in detecting subtle kinematic variations.

Conclusions:

  • Triaxial accelerometers are effective tools for investigating dynamic differences in seemingly similar work tasks, especially in office environments.
  • Even a simplified uniaxial accelerometer can provide valuable data on head acceleration for ergonomic analysis.
  • These technologies can aid in identifying and mitigating potential ergonomic risks associated with computer-based work.