Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Imaging Flow Cytometry to Study Microbial Autoaggregation
Published on: September 29, 2023
Diagnosis of bacteriuria and leukocyturia by automated flow cytometry compared with urine culture
Barbara Pieretti1, Pietro Brunati, Beatrice Pini
1Laboratorio Analisi Chimiche e Microbiologiche, Ospedale Valduce, Como, Italy. barbara.pieretti@libero.it
Abstract:
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a widespread disease, and thus, the most common samples tested in diagnostic microbiology laboratories are urine samples. The "gold standard" for diagnosis is still bacterial culture, but a large proportion of samples are negative. Unnecessary culture can be reduced by an effective screening test. We evaluated the performance of a new urine cytometer, the Sysmex UF-1000i (Dasit), on 703 urine samples submitted to our laboratory for culture. We compared bacteria and leukocyte (WBC) counts performed with the Sysmex UF-1000i to CFU-per-milliliter quantification on CPS agar to assess the best cutoff values. Different cutoff values of bacteria/ml and WBC/ml were compared to give the best discrimination. On the basis of the results obtained in this study, we suggest that when the Sysmex UF-1000i analyzer is used as a screening test for UTI the cutoff values should be 65 bacteria/ml and 100 WBC/ml. Diagnostic performance in terms of sensitivity (98.2%), specificity (62.1%), negative predictive value (98.7%), positive predictive value (53.7%), and diagnostic accuracy (73.3%) were satisfactory. Screening with the Sysmex UF-1000i is acceptable for routine use. In our laboratory, we have reduced the number of bacterial cultures by 43%, speeded up their reporting, and decreased the inappropriate use of antibiotics.
Related Concept Videos
Flow Cytometry
In...
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Automated Microbial Diagnostics

