Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Statins: cost analysis in Indian scenario from eight major clinical trials
1Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat- 364001, India. jayesh_sanmukhani@yahoo.co.in
Insights
Statins are effective in reducing coronary heart disease (CHD) deaths. This study found statin use is more cost-effective for secondary prevention than primary prevention, with varying costs per event averted.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of mortality in India, particularly among younger populations.
- Statins have demonstrated efficacy in reducing CHD mortality in clinical trials.
- Understanding the cost-effectiveness of statins is crucial for public health policy in India.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of statins for preventing major coronary events and deaths.
- To analyze the CER of statins across different clinical settings (primary, secondary, and high-risk prevention).
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of statins based on data from major clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Systematic selection of key clinical trials including WOSCOPS, AFCAPS, ASCOT-LLA (primary prevention), CARE, LIPID, 4S (secondary prevention), and HPS, PROSPER (high-risk patients).
- Calculation of absolute risk reduction and Number Needed to Benefit (NNTB) for various subgroups.
- Determination of CER for branded and generic statins using Indian drug pricing data.
Main Results:
- CER varied significantly across studies and patient groups, ranging from Rs. 6.9 lacs to Rs. 52.4 lacs per event averted or death avoided.
- Primary prevention generally showed higher CERs compared to secondary prevention.
- Specific CERs were reported for major coronary events averted and CHD deaths avoided in different trial settings.
Conclusions:
- Statin therapy is associated with higher costs in primary prevention compared to secondary prevention.
- Further research is recommended to validate these findings and inform health policy decisions regarding statin use.
- The cost-effectiveness of statins necessitates careful consideration within the Indian healthcare context.
Background And Aims:
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death in India resulting in loss of young Indians. Statins have proved to reduce the CHD mortality in various clinical trials. The aim of the study is to find the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) for each major coronary event averted and a coronary death avoided by use of statins in different clinical settings based on the data from the major clinical trials on statins.
Materials And Methods:
Using electronic database and as per our inclusion and exclusion criteria we selected the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS), the Air Force Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS) and the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial--Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA) study for primary prevention; the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial (CARE), the Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) Study and the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) for secondary prevention and two studies, the Heart Protection Study (HPS) and the Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER) study for high-risk patients. The results of these studies were used for cost-effectiveness analysis of statins in different patient groups.
Statistical Analysis:
Absolute risk reduction, Number Needed to Benefit (NNTB), NNTB/year for total sample and in subgroups of males, females and age >65 was derived. CER for branded and generic versions was calculated by using the prices of statins listed in Indian Drug Review Triple i.
Results:
Cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) in primary prevention studies i.e., the WOSCOPS, the AFCAPS and the ASCOT-LLA was Rs. 25.8 lacs, Rs. 23.8 lacs and Rs. 7.9 lacs per major coronary event averted respectively. CER in secondary prevention studies i.e., the CARE and the LIPID was approximately Rs. 20 lacs per major coronary event averted while it was Rs. 52.4 lacs and Rs. 37 lacs per coronary heart disease (CHD) death avoided. CER from the 4S was Rs. 6.9 lacs per major coronary event and Rs. 16.9 lacs per CHD death averted. CER in the HPS and the PROSPER study was Rs. 17.9 lacs and Rs. 27.1 lacs per major coronary event avoided in high-risk patients.
Conclusion:
Cost associated with the use of statins is higher in primary prevention as compared to secondary prevention. More studies are needed to confirm the cost-effectiveness of statins to make any decision for health policy.
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Clinical Trials: Overview
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...