Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
No respect: research in quality, safety, and process improvement
Ilan S Rubinfeld1, H Mathilda Horst
1Ilan S Rubinfeld, MD, MBA, is an Attending Physician in Trauma and Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, MI. He is also Assistant Professor of Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine; Associate Program Director, General Surgery Residency, Henry Ford Hospital; and Associate Medical Director, Surgical Intensive Care, Henry Ford Hospital.
Healthcare quality improvement research is crucial but faces institutional barriers. Applying pure science standards to practical clinical settings can hinder essential, on-the-ground improvement efforts.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare research
- Clinical practice
- Quality improvement
Background:
- High-quality research in healthcare is essential for patient safety and effective treatment.
- Despite the recognized need, institutional bias and inertia often impede quality improvement initiatives.
- The healthcare culture exhibits a complex, ambivalent attitude towards quality improvement (QI) work.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the challenges and implications of applying rigorous scientific standards to practical, frontline clinical improvement efforts.
- To explore the conflict between the demand for high-quality research and the realities of implementing QI in healthcare settings.
Main Methods:
- Commentary based on expert analysis and reflection.
- Exploration of the "sharp end" of clinical practice where QI occurs.
- Discussion of the application of "pure science" standards in applied healthcare settings.
Main Results:
- Institutional bias and inertia create significant obstacles for quality improvement research and implementation.
- The strict application of pure science standards may not always be appropriate or feasible for frontline clinical improvement work.
- A "love-hate" relationship exists within healthcare regarding quality improvement efforts.
Conclusions:
- There is a critical need to reconcile the demands for rigorous research with the practicalities of clinical quality improvement.
- Addressing institutional barriers is vital to foster and support essential frontline improvement work.
- Rethinking the application of scientific standards in clinical practice is necessary to facilitate effective quality improvement.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Statistical Process Control
Quality Assurance
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Obedience
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...