Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Proofreading

Proofreading

Synthesis of new DNA molecules starts when DNA polymerase links nucleotides together in a sequence that is complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity for the correct base to ensure fidelity in DNA replication. The DNA polymerase furthermore proofreads during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.Errors during Replication Are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase EnzymeGenomic DNA is synthesized in...

Cancer

Cancer

Cancers arise due to mutations in genes involved in the regulation of cell division, which leads to unrestricted cell proliferation. Modern science and medicine have made great strides in the understanding and treatment of cancer, including eradicating cancer in some patients. However, there is still no cure for cancer. This is largely due to the fact that cancer is a large group of many diseases.

Tissues

Tissues

Cells with similar structure and function are grouped into tissues. A group of tissues with a specialized function is called an organ. There are four main types of tissue in vertebrates: epithelial, connective, muscle, and nervous.

pre-mRNA Processing

pre-mRNA Processing

In eukaryotic cells, transcripts made by RNA polymerase are modified and processed before exiting the nucleus. Unprocessed RNA is called precursor mRNA or pre-mRNA to distinguish it from mature mRNA.
Once about 20-40 ribonucleotides have been joined together by RNA polymerase, a group of enzymes adds a “cap” to the 5’ end of the growing transcript. In this process, a 5’ phosphate is replaced by modified guanosine that has a methyl group attached to it (7-Methyl guanosine). This 5’ cap helps the...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

PCR

PCR

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Clerkships in Emergency Medicine.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2020

Same author

Letters of Recommendation.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2019

Same author

Scientific speaker apprenticeship programme.

Medical education·2016

Same author

Image Diagnosis: Tubo-ovarian Abscess with Hydrosalpinx.

The Permanente journal·2016

Same author

Image Diagnosis: Worm-Induced Biliary Obstruction.

The Permanente journal·2016

Same author

Does the multiple mini-interview address stakeholder needs? An applicant's perspective.

Annals of emergency medicine·2014

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

Reviewing manuscripts for biomedical journals.

¹Emergency Medicine Physician, Santa Clara Medical Center; Stanford/Kaiser Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Emergency Medicine (Surgery), Stanford University. gus.garmel@kp.org

The Permanente Journal

|August 27, 2010

Summary

Writing for scientific publication is challenging. Improving manuscript quality and understanding the peer-review process are key for researchers and readers in the biomedical field.

Area of Science:

Biomedical Literature
Scientific Communication

Background:

Writing for scientific publication presents challenges for professionals, impacting research dissemination.
Author emotions and enjoyment during the writing process may influence manuscript outcomes.
Existing literature covers manuscript preparation and the review process.

Purpose of the Study:

To describe essential elements for improving scientific writing.
To discuss the biomedical literature review process, reviewer importance, and responsibilities.
To provide insights for interpreting medical literature.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on scientific writing and peer review.
Discussion of manuscript components and the peer-review system.

More Related Videos

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

Optimization of Breast Biopsy and Mastectomy Sample Collection Procedures for Biobanking, Personalized Medicine, and Research Applications

Optimization of Breast Biopsy and Mastectomy Sample Collection Procedures for Biobanking, Personalized Medicine, and Research Applications

Published on: September 2, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

Optimization of Breast Biopsy and Mastectomy Sample Collection Procedures for Biobanking, Personalized Medicine, and Research Applications

Optimization of Breast Biopsy and Mastectomy Sample Collection Procedures for Biobanking, Personalized Medicine, and Research Applications

Published on: September 2, 2025

Analysis of reviewer roles and qualities in scientific publishing.

Main Results:

Scientific writing requires practice and attention to essential manuscript elements.
The peer-review process is crucial for scientific integrity but faces challenges regarding reviewer accountability.
Reviewers play a vital role, and their contributions are often underappreciated.

Conclusions:

Improving scientific writing is essential for effective research communication.
Understanding and refining the peer-review process enhances scientific validity.
Knowledge of manuscript elements and review dynamics benefits authors, reviewers, and readers.