Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Translational Orthotopic Models of Glioblastoma Multiforme
Published on: February 17, 2023
Intracranial meningiomas of atypical (WHO grade II) histology
Leland Rogers1, Mark Gilbert, Michael A Vogelbaum
1GammaWest Cancer Services, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Leland@GammaWest.com
Abstract:
Atypical (WHO grade II) meningiomas occupy an intermediate risk group between benign (WHO grade I) and anaplastic (WHO grade III) meningiomas. Although grade II meningiomas have traditionally been recognized in only about 5% of cases, after changes in diagnostic criteria with the current 2007 WHO standards, they now comprise approximately 20-35% of all meningiomas. Given the magnitude of this change, much work is now needed to solidify the adoption of these standards, to render inter-observer and inter-institutional comparisons more uniform, and to more carefully define the incidence of grade II histology. However, it is clear that they carry a several-fold increased risk of recurrence, as well as an increased rate of mortality. We will discuss the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with atypical meningioma; review the current phase II cooperative trials; and draw attention to some questions timely for pre-clinical and clinical research.
Insights
Atypical (WHO grade II) meningiomas are now more common due to updated criteria, posing a higher risk of recurrence and mortality. Further research is needed to standardize diagnosis and treatment for these intermediate-risk brain tumors.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Pathology
- Neurosurgery
Background:
- Atypical meningiomas (WHO grade II) represent an intermediate risk category.
- Updated 2007 WHO diagnostic criteria increased their reported incidence from 5% to 20-35% of all meningiomas.
- This shift necessitates standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of atypical meningiomas.
- To review current phase II cooperative clinical trials.
- To highlight areas for future pre-clinical and clinical research.
Main Methods:
- Review of diagnostic criteria and incidence data for WHO grade II meningiomas.
- Analysis of recurrence and mortality rates.
- Examination of current clinical trial landscape.
Main Results:
- Atypical meningiomas show a significantly increased risk of recurrence and mortality compared to benign types.
- The revised WHO classification has substantially increased the diagnosed incidence of grade II meningiomas.
- Standardization of diagnostic criteria and inter-institutional comparisons are crucial.
Conclusions:
- Atypical meningiomas require careful management due to their intermediate-risk profile.
- Further research is essential to refine diagnostic accuracy and optimize treatment strategies.
- Addressing the increased incidence and associated risks is a priority in neuro-oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Cerebral Edema ll: Pathophysiology
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology

