Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A scheme for classifying carcinogens.

J Ashby1, N G Doerrer, F G Flamm

  • 1ICI Central Toxicology Laboratory, Macclesfield, Cheshire, England.

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP
|December 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The gravitationally unstable gas disk of a starburst galaxy 12 billion years ago.

Nature·2018
Same author

Inspiring a career in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a first-degree medical student's perspective.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2017
Same author

The effect on Neisseria gonorrhoeae screening rates in an integrated clinic following the introduction of dual nucleic acid amplification tests.

International journal of STD & AIDS·2014
Same author

Studies in vitro to discern the structural requirements for carcinogenicity in analogues of the carcinogen 4-dimethylaminoazobenzene (butter yellow).

Carcinogenesis·2012
Same author

Evaluation in vitro of several pyrrolizidine alkaloid carcinogens: observations on the essential pyrrolic nucleus.

Carcinogenesis·2012
Same author

HIV testing uptake and acceptability in an inner city polyclinic.

AIDS care·2012
Same journal

Applying the Omics Data Analysis Framework for Regulatory Application (R-ODAF) filtering criteria: A Case Study with 3-Methylcholanthrene.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular toxicity as a globally harmonized system hazard trait: The evidence and the path forward.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

The NTP chronic inhalation study does not support an inherent lung cancer hazard of talc: Implications of lung particle overload and maximum tolerated dose.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

Consideration of Carcinogenicity and Mode of Action Information by an Independent Expert Panel to Support Derivation of No-Significant-Risk-Level Values for Vinyl Acetate Monomer.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

Which carcinogenicity study should I use? Automated identification of reliable studies.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

Adoption of artificial intelligence in drug review across the lifecycle: Transformation of regulatory decision-making.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new scheme for classifying chemical carcinogens based on evidence of human cancer risk. It refines existing methods by incorporating new scientific data and animal model findings.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Carcinogenesis Research
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Existing chemical carcinogen classification systems by IARC, US EPA, and Tripartite Group provide a foundation.
  • New scientific knowledge in chemical carcinogenesis and advancements in animal models necessitate an updated approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel scheme for classifying chemical carcinogens.
  • To categorize substances based on the weight of evidence for human cancer hazard.
  • To integrate recent scientific advancements into carcinogen classification.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an eight-category classification system.
  • Incorporated evidence from human studies, animal bioassays, and mechanistic studies.
  • Emphasized expert judgment in weighing evidence for classification.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Introduced eight distinct categories for chemical carcinogen classification (Category 1-8).
  • Categories range from 'known human carcinogen' to 'evidence of noncarcinogenicity'.
  • Defined criteria including human data, animal bioassays, and mechanistic insights.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed scheme offers a logical extension of prior classification systems.
  • Classification requires expert judgment, not solely automated rules.
  • Identified key information types and their application in carcinogen classification.