Evaluating quality of census tract data in the NPCR dataset
Simple Singh1, Umed A Ajani, Reda J Wilson
1Cancer Surveillance Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mail Stop K-53 Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. sdsingh@cdc.gov
Cancer registry data quality is crucial. Census tract information completeness in the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) dataset varied significantly, impacting its use for spatial analyses.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Cancer Surveillance
- Data Quality Assessment
Background:
- Accurate interpretation of cancer data is vital for cancer control and prevention.
- High-quality data is essential for researchers and public health programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the quality of census tract information within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) dataset.
- To inform the appropriate use of NPCR census tract data in future analyses.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 2001-2005 submitted to the 2008 NPCR Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS).
- Calculated the proportion of records with valid census tract 2000 information (NAACCR item #130) overall and per registry.
Main Results:
- Valid census tract data was available for 59% of NPCR records (2001-2005).
- Significant variation existed among registries: 54% met the >=90% completeness threshold, while 24% had <=5% completeness.
- Completeness showed slight increases from 2001 (53%) to 2005 (61%).
Conclusions:
- Census tract data completeness in the NPCR dataset is inconsistent across registries and years.
- Variability may stem from evolving submission practices, data quality standards, or resource limitations.
- While complete data is ideal for national spatial research, registry-specific data may support local, state, or regional studies.
Related Concept Videos
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are observed.
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
How Data are Classified: Numerical Data
Quantitative data may be either discrete or continuous. All quantitative data that take on only specific numerical...


