Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

09:10
Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
Published on: August 5, 2021
Two imaging techniques for 3D quantification of pre-cementation space for CAD/CAM crowns
Patchanee Rungruanganunt1, J Robert Kelly, Douglas J Adams
1Department of Reconstructive Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030-1615, USA. PATCH@NSO1.UCHC.EDU
Journal of Dentistry
|August 31, 2010
Summary
X-ray microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) and quantitative optical analysis can both measure 3D prosthesis fit using pre-cementation space impressions. Micro-CT offers wider range and precision, while optical analysis excels with thin walls.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Dental Technology
- Metrology
Background:
- The three-dimensional (3D) internal fit of dental prostheses to prepared teeth is crucial for clinical success.
- Assessing marginal opening alone may not fully represent the overall prosthesis fit.
- Quantitative methods are needed to evaluate 3D fit and compare CAD/CAM systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively evaluate two techniques for defining 3D prosthesis fit using pre-cementation space impressions.
- To compare X-ray microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) and quantitative optical analysis for this purpose.
Main Methods:
- Pre-cementation space impressions of a zirconia coping on its die were created using poly(vinyl siloxane).
- Calibration specimens were fabricated and analyzed using both micro-CT and quantitative optical analysis.
- Regression analysis compared calibration data from both techniques.
Main Results:
- Micro-CT demonstrated tighter confidence intervals and a wider measurement range compared to the optical technique.
- Optical analysis was more effective for analyzing specific regions and extremely thin impression walls (<10-15μm).
- Micro-CT offered easier specimen preparation and accurate dimension capture with its segmentation parameters.
Conclusions:
- Both micro-CT and optical analysis are viable methods for quantifying pre-cementation space impression thickness.
- Each technique presents distinct advantages and limitations.
- Either method holds potential for clinical studies or optimizing CAD/CAM protocols.
