Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

12:55
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Community participation: measurement issues with persons with deficits in executive functioning
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. bogner.1@osu.edu
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
|August 31, 2010
Summary
Individuals with executive functioning deficits struggle with survey responses due to cognitive challenges. More research is needed to develop strategies for accurate data collection in these populations.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Rehabilitation Science
- Survey Methodology
Background:
- Executive functioning and self-regulation deficits are common in rehabilitation populations.
- These deficits can impair accurate responses to psychosocial surveys, affecting data reliability.
- The Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology (CASM) framework highlights executive functions in survey response processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To underscore the challenges faced by individuals with executive functioning deficits in survey participation.
- To emphasize the need for empirical research evaluating strategies to improve data accuracy in these populations.
- To advocate for survey design and administration that accounts for executive functioning deficits.
Main Methods:
- The study reviews the CASM paradigm, outlining four key cognitive processes in survey response.
- It discusses how executive functions are integral to each of these processes.
- The text highlights existing research gaps concerning individuals with executive functioning deficits.
Main Results:
- Respondents without cognitive deficits already experience challenges with executive functions during surveys.
- Individuals with executive functioning deficits are expected to face significantly greater difficulties.
- Current research lacks empirical evaluation of strategies to mitigate these difficulties.
Conclusions:
- Survey methodology must address the impact of executive functioning deficits on response accuracy.
- There is a critical need for research to test and implement error-reduction strategies for vulnerable populations.
- Improved survey design and administration are essential for reliable psychosocial data collection.
