Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay

Interference and Decay

Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...

Language Development

Language Development

Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Observational Learning

Observational Learning

Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning because...

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Predictors of mental well-being among family caregivers of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities during COVID-19.

BJPsych open·2024

Same author

Evaluation of the uptake of tuberculosis preventative therapy for people living with HIV in Namibia: a multiple methods analysis.

BMC public health·2020

Same author

Implementation and evaluation of a Project ECHO telementoring program for the Namibian HIV workforce.

Human resources for health·2020

Same author

Considering efficacy and effectiveness trials of cognitive behavioral therapy among youth with autism: A systematic review.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice·2020

Same author

Congruency Encoding Effects on Recognition Memory: A Stage-Specific Account of Desirable Difficulty.

Frontiers in psychology·2019

Same author

Phonological Interlopers Tend to Repeat When Tip-of-the-Tongue States Repeat.

Frontiers in psychology·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Published on: August 9, 2024

Repeated speech errors: evidence for learning.

Karin R Humphreys¹, Heather Menzies, Johanna K Lake

¹Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. krh@mcmaster.ca

|August 31, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Speech errors on specific words can reoccur due to implicit learning of incorrect word mappings. This learning effect fades after 48 hours, indicating dynamic language adaptation.

More Related Videos

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors

Published on: January 3, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Published on: August 9, 2024

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors

Published on: January 3, 2017

Area of Science:

Psycholinguistics
Cognitive Science
Speech Production

Background:

Phonological speech errors offer insights into language production mechanisms.
The potential for implicit learning to influence speech error patterns is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the recurrence of phonological speech errors.
To determine if speech error recurrence is linked to implicit learning of lemma-to-phonology mappings.
To examine the temporal dynamics of this learning effect.

Main Methods:

Utilized the Speech, اللفظ, Intonation, and Prosody (SLIP) procedure to elicit phonological speech errors.
Conducted three experiments involving study and test phases with varying time intervals.
Included a pseudo-error condition to control for simple repetition effects.

Main Results:

Phonological speech errors were over four times more likely to reoccur on the same word item within minutes.
The recurrence effect was attributed to learning an error pathway, not mere repetition.
The error recurrence effect diminished significantly after 48 hours, ruling out item-specific difficulty.

Conclusions:

Speech error recurrence is influenced by implicit learning of incorrect word-form mappings.
This learning effect is transient, fading within 48 hours.
Language production is a dynamic system that adapts based on experience, including errors.