Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo-controlled study
Karl Swedberg1, Michel Komajda, Michael Böhm
1Department of Emergency and Cardiovascular Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. karl.swedberg@gu.se
Insights
Heart rate reduction using ivabradine significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure. This study confirms the role of heart rate in heart failure pathophysiology, reducing cardiovascular death and hospitalizations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Chronic heart failure presents significant mortality and morbidity.
- Elevated resting heart rate is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes in heart failure patients.
- The selective sinus-node inhibitor ivabradine targets heart rate reduction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on clinical outcomes in patients with symptomatic heart failure.
- To assess the efficacy of ivabradine in reducing cardiovascular death and hospital admissions for heart failure worsening.
- To confirm the role of heart rate in the pathophysiology of heart failure.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.
- Inclusion criteria: symptomatic heart failure, LVEF ≤35%, sinus rhythm with HR ≥70 bpm, recent hospitalization for heart failure, and stable background treatment.
- Patients received ivabradine titrated to 7.5 mg BID or placebo; primary endpoint was composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization.
Main Results:
- 6558 patients were randomized (3268 ivabradine, 3290 placebo) with median follow-up of 22.9 months.
- Ivabradine significantly reduced the primary endpoint events by 18% (HR 0.82, p<0.0001), mainly driven by reduced hospital admissions for worsening heart failure and heart failure deaths.
- Adverse events: symptomatic bradycardia (5% ivabradine vs 1% placebo) and visual disturbances (3% ivabradine vs 1% placebo) were more frequent with ivabradine.
Conclusions:
- Heart rate reduction with ivabradine improves clinical outcomes in heart failure patients.
- The study underscores the critical role of heart rate in heart failure pathophysiology.
- Ivabradine is an effective treatment option for selected heart failure patients to reduce adverse events.
Background:
Chronic heart failure is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Raised resting heart rate is a risk factor for adverse outcomes. We aimed to assess the effect of heart-rate reduction by the selective sinus-node inhibitor ivabradine on outcomes in heart failure.
Methods:
Patients were eligible for participation in this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study if they had symptomatic heart failure and a left-ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or lower, were in sinus rhythm with heart rate 70 beats per min or higher, had been admitted to hospital for heart failure within the previous year, and were on stable background treatment including a β blocker if tolerated. Patients were randomly assigned by computer-generated allocation schedule to ivabradine titrated to a maximum of 7.5 mg twice daily or matching placebo. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death or hospital admission for worsening heart failure. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN70429960.
Findings:
6558 patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups (3268 ivabradine, 3290 placebo). Data were available for analysis for 3241 patients in the ivabradine group and 3264 patients allocated placebo. Median follow-up was 22.9 (IQR 18-28) months. 793 (24%) patients in the ivabradine group and 937 (29%) of those taking placebo had a primary endpoint event (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.90, p<0.0001). The effects were driven mainly by hospital admissions for worsening heart failure (672 [21%] placebo vs 514 [16%] ivabradine; HR 0.74, 0.66-0.83; p<0.0001) and deaths due to heart failure (151 [5%] vs 113 [3%]; HR 0.74, 0.58-0.94, p=0.014). Fewer serious adverse events occurred in the ivabradine group (3388 events) than in the placebo group (3847; p=0.025). 150 (5%) of ivabradine patients had symptomatic bradycardia compared with 32 (1%) of the placebo group (p<0.0001). Visual side-effects (phosphenes) were reported by 89 (3%) of patients on ivabradine and 17 (1%) on placebo (p<0.0001).
Interpretation:
Our results support the importance of heart-rate reduction with ivabradine for improvement of clinical outcomes in heart failure and confirm the important role of heart rate in the pathophysiology of this disorder.
Funding:
Servier, France.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies