Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

Optical microscopy uses optic principles to provide detailed images of samples. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek designed the first compound optical microscope in the 17th century to visualize blood cells, bacteria, and yeast cells. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes with enhanced magnification and resolution.
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Validation of interferometric imaging from a pupil-masking experiment on a solar telescope.

Applied optics·2010

Same author

Using adaptive optics to enhance Michelson interferometry.

Applied optics·2010

Same author

Turbulence of the upper atmosphere and isoplanatism.

Applied optics·2010

Same author

Variational solution for modal wave-front projection functions of minimum-error norm.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2001

Same journal

Multifunctional reconfigurable terahertz metasurface based on vanadium dioxide phase transition: achieving broadband absorption and efficient polarization conversion.

Applied optics·2026

Same journal

High-Q-factor electromagnetically induced transparency utilizing quasi-bound states in the continuum in an all-dielectric terahertz metasurface.

Applied optics·2026

Same journal

Automated stitching interferometry for high-precision metrology of X-ray mirrors.

Applied optics·2026

Same journal

Experimental demonstration of an approach to designing a metal-dielectric DBR resonant cavity structure.

Applied optics·2026

Same journal

High-precision wavefront reconstruction from a single-shot interferogram using a physics-driven hybrid feature calibration network.

Applied optics·2026

Same journal

Ultra-high-Q Fano resonance based on coupled topological corner states in Kagome photonic crystals.

Applied optics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2026

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

Published on: August 12, 2013

Wavelength-dependent sensitivity limitations affecting low light level Michelson stellar interferometry.

|August 31, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Ground interferometers measure star diameters and separations, but noise limits their sensitivity. This study analyzes limitations and calculates detection thresholds for low light observations.

More Related Videos

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing

Published on: March 22, 2019

Digital Inline Holographic Microscopy (DIHM) of Weakly-scattering Subjects

Digital Inline Holographic Microscopy (DIHM) of Weakly-scattering Subjects

Published on: February 8, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2026

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

Published on: August 12, 2013

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing

Published on: March 22, 2019

Digital Inline Holographic Microscopy (DIHM) of Weakly-scattering Subjects

Digital Inline Holographic Microscopy (DIHM) of Weakly-scattering Subjects

Published on: February 8, 2014

Area of Science:

Astronomy and Astrophysics
Optical Interferometry

Background:

Ground-based interferometry is established for measuring stellar diameters and multiple star systems.
Noise sources like shot noise, detector dark current, and background radiation limit interferometric sensitivity.

Purpose of the Study:

To review sensitivity limitations in low light level Michelson amplitude interferometry.
To calculate wavelength-dependent detection thresholds for stellar observations.

Main Methods:

Review of noise processes affecting interferometric sensitivity.
Calculation of detection thresholds based on limiting stellar visual magnitudes.

Main Results:

Identified key noise sources limiting interferometric sensitivity.
Quantified wavelength-dependent detection thresholds in terms of limiting stellar magnitudes.

Conclusions:

Noise fundamentally constrains the utility of ground interferometers for cataloging stellar measurements.
Understanding these limitations is crucial for optimizing low light level interferometric observations.