Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

Deconvolution

Deconvolution

Deconvolution, also known as inverse filtering, is the process of extracting the impulse response from known input and output signals. This technique is vital in scenarios where the system's characteristics are unknown, and they must be inferred from the observable signals.
Deconvolution involves several mathematical techniques to derive the impulse response. One common approach is polynomial division. In this method, the input and output sequences are treated as coefficients of...

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...

Coefficient of Variation

Coefficient of Variation

The coefficient of variation measures the dispersion of the data points or distribution around the mean. Using the coefficient of variation, we can compare two data series with drastically different means or different units of measurement. The coefficient of variation for a sample and a population is expressed as a percentage of the ratio of standard deviation to the mean.
The coefficient of variation is a practical statistical tool in finance. It allows investors to assess the volatility or...

Residuals and Least-Squares Property

Residuals and Least-Squares Property

The vertical distance between the actual value of y and the estimated value of y. In other words, it measures the vertical distance between the actual data point and the predicted point on the line
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...

Logarithmic Differentiation

Logarithmic Differentiation

When a car’s weight and driving forces act on a tire, they impose an external load on the rubber material. This load is resisted internally by forces distributed throughout the tire structure, which are defined as stress. The resulting deformation of the rubber due to this stress is quantified as strain. The relationship between stress and strain governs how the tire deforms under load and is central to understanding its mechanical response during operation.Rubber exhibits a nonlinear...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Empowering imaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.

Neurobiology of aging·2014

Same author

Seemingly unrelated regression empowers detection of network failure in dementia.

Neurobiology of aging·2014

Same author

Physical activity, body mass index, and brain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease.

Neurobiology of aging·2014

Same author

Assessing environmental impacts of offshore wind farms: lessons learned and recommendations for the future.

Aquatic biosystems·2014

Same author

Relationship between Systemic and Cerebral Vascular Disease and Brain Structure Integrity in Normal Elderly Individuals.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2014

Same author

Age effects on cortical thickness in cognitively normal elderly individuals.

Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra·2014

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

HARDI DATA DENOISING USING VECTORIAL TOTAL VARIATION AND LOGARITHMIC BARRIER.

Yunho Kim¹, Paul M Thompson, Luminita A Vese

¹Department of Mathematics University of California, Irvine Irvine, CA 92697-3875, USA.

Inverse Problems and Imaging (Springfield, Mo.)

|August 31, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

We developed two variational methods to denoise High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI) data for medical brain imaging. These methods effectively reduce noise while preserving crucial data structures for better brain connectivity analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Medical Imaging
Neuroscience
Applied Mathematics

Background:

Diffusion imaging measures water diffusion in the brain, enabling fiber pathway reconstruction.
High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI) offers more detailed information than DTI but is prone to noise.
Noise in HARDI data, especially at higher b-values, can compromise the accuracy of diffusion measurements and connectivity mapping.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose and evaluate two novel variational methods for denoising HARDI data.
To compare the effectiveness of denoising the raw HARDI signal (S) versus the spherical Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (sADC).
To determine which denoising approach best preserves the underlying data structure for improved brain imaging analysis.

Main Methods:

Development of two distinct variational denoising models for HARDI data.
Model 1: Direct denoising of the acquired HARDI signal (S).
Model 2: Denoising of the derived spherical Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (sADC).

Main Results:

Both proposed variational methods demonstrate effectiveness in reducing noise in HARDI data.
Experimental results on synthetic and real HARDI data are presented.
Comparisons highlight the performance of each denoising strategy in preserving data integrity.

Conclusions:

The study introduces effective variational methods for HARDI data denoising.
The findings will guide the selection of optimal denoising strategies for medical brain imaging.
Accurate denoising of HARDI data is crucial for reliable brain connectivity and integrity mapping.