Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

13:17
In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Photocontrolled Biologically Active Compounds - Potential Drug Candidates for Cancer Photopharmacology
Published on: September 29, 2023
Differences in in vitro photodynamic sensitivity among head and neck cancers
V Boonkitticharoen1, B Kulapaditharom, S Punnachaiya
1Department of Radiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Lasers in Medical Science
|August 31, 2010
Summary
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) effectiveness varies by cancer type. Adenocarcinoma showed the highest sensitivity, while mucoepidermoid carcinoma was least sensitive to PDT treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Photochemistry
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising cancer treatment modality.
- Understanding differential responses of various cancer histologies to PDT is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
- Head and neck cancers exhibit diverse histological subtypes, potentially influencing PDT efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the differential response of various head and neck cancer cell lines to photodynamic therapy (PDT).
- To establish a sensitivity ranking of different cancer histologies based on their response to PDT.
- To explore factors influencing PDT sensitivity, including drug uptake and intrinsic cellular properties.
Main Methods:
- Culturing of five human cancer cell lines: squamous cell carcinoma (pharynx, tongue), mucoepidermoid carcinoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and adenocarcinoma.
- Treatment of cell lines with haematoporphyrin derivative (HpD) at varying concentrations.
- Excitation of HpD using a black light source (340-380 nm).
- Assessment of cell viability using the MTT assay to determine LD(50) values.
Main Results:
- Significant variations in PDT response were observed across the investigated cancer cell lines.
- Sensitivity ranking based on LD(50) was determined as: adenocarcinoma > squamous cell carcinoma > rhabdomyosarcoma > mucoepidermoid carcinoma.
- Drug uptake studies suggested that both cellular sensitizer levels and intrinsic cell sensitivity contribute to PDT response magnitude.
Conclusions:
- PDT exhibits differential efficacy across distinct head and neck cancer histologies.
- Adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma appear more responsive to HpD-mediated PDT compared to rhabdomyosarcoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma.
- This research provides valuable insights for selecting appropriate histological subtypes of head and neck cancers for PDT treatment.
