Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The validity of experimental evidence.

J M Dibbets1

  • 1Department Orthodontics, Dental School, Ann Arbor.

Anatomischer Anzeiger
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Even with accurate data, research can lead to incorrect conclusions. Scientific interpretation is influenced by prevailing viewpoints, potentially overlooking alternative explanations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The growth of articular eminence height during craniofacial growth period.

Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice·2002
Same author

What makes orthodontic treatment good?

Clinical orthodontics and research·2001
Same author

[Early orthodontic treatment, a diagnostic challenge].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde·2001
Same author

The postnatal development of the temporal part of the human temporomandibular joint. A quantitative study on skulls.

Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft·1998
Same author

Multiple linear regression as an analytical tool in cephalometric studies.

British journal of orthodontics·1997
Same author

Association of lip posture and the dimensions of the tonsils and sagittal airway with facial morphology.

The Angle orthodontist·1997

Area of Science:

  • Scientific methodology
  • Research integrity
  • Epistemology in science

Background:

  • The common assumption is that correct data invariably leads to valid scientific deductions.
  • However, literature analysis reveals instances of erroneous conclusions drawn from accurate data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate that rigorous research alone does not guarantee correct conclusions.
  • To highlight the influence of prevailing scientific viewpoints on data interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies with correct data but erroneous conclusions.
  • Analysis of historical and contemporary scientific interpretation patterns.

Main Results:

  • Identified striking examples of incorrect deductions from correct data.
  • Observed a tendency for researchers and the scientific community to interpret results within accepted paradigms.
  • Found that alternative or less likely explanations are often overlooked.

Conclusions:

  • Meticulously performed research is not a foolproof guarantee of accurate conclusions.
  • The "scientific forum" and accepted viewpoints can bias interpretation, leading to potential errors.
  • Awareness of these cognitive and social influences is crucial for present and future scientific endeavors.

Related Experiment Videos