Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Primary Healthcare Services

Primary Healthcare Services

Primary care promotes wellness and prevents disease. This care includes health promotion, education, protection (such as immunizations), early disease screening, and environmental considerations. Settings providing this type of healthcare include physician offices, public health clinics, school nursing, and community health nursing.
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...

Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview

Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview

Ischemic heart disease occurs when the heart's blood supply dwindles, causing an ominous lack of oxygen and nutrients. This deficiency, stemming from reduced or obstructed blood flow, spells danger, leading to heart muscle damage and dysfunction.
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and narrowing...

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...

Bioequivalence: Overview

Bioequivalence: Overview

Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...

Ethical Dilemmas II

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Why Do the Bells Toll? : How to Understand and Address the Disputes Around Evidence in Support of the Use of Puberty Blockers for Young People with Gender Incongruence/Dysphoria.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026

Same author

Letter of Concern About Ruuska et al. From 4 April 2026.

Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)·2026

Same author

Keep calm but do not carry on: ethical issues with the recommendations made by the Cass Review-Giordano response to the commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2025

Same author

The importance of early and accurate service information for young people accessing gender care.

Scientific reports·2025

Same author

Principlism and contemporary ethical considerations for providers of transgender health care.

International journal of transgender health·2025

Same author

Keep calm but do not carry on: ethical issues with the recommendations made by the Cass Review (2024).

Journal of medical ethics·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

The 2008 Declaration of Helsinki: some reflections.

Simona Giordano¹

¹The University of Manchester, The School of Law, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, USA. simona.giordano@manchester.ac.uk

Journal of Medical Ethics

|September 4, 2010

Summary

The Declaration of Helsinki amendments prioritize participant well-being over all interests, potentially undermining altruism and responsibility in biomedical research. This analysis questions the ethical implications of these revised research participant protection guidelines.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Area of Science:

Bioethics
Medical Research Ethics
Declaration of Helsinki

Background:

The 2008 amendments to the Declaration of Helsinki revised key paragraphs concerning participant welfare and research justification.
Previous versions emphasized participant well-being over science/society; new versions extend this to 'all other interests'.
Research on disadvantaged populations was previously justified by potential benefit; new guidelines maintain this focus.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically assess the ethical plausibility of the 2008 Declaration of Helsinki amendments regarding participant interests.
To examine the implications of prioritizing research subjects' interests over third parties, including societal and scientific needs.
To explore the potential erosion of ethical principles like altruism and shared responsibility in biomedical research.

Main Methods:

Analysis of the 2008 amendments to the Declaration of Helsinki, specifically paragraphs 5 (now 6) and 19 (now 17).
Consideration of existing debates on the moral duty to participate in biomedical research.
Ethical evaluation of the statements within the broader context of the Declaration and societal values.

Main Results:

The revised paragraphs, while aiming to protect participants, may present an oversimplified view of scientific endeavors.
An absolute prioritization of participant interests over all other interests could conflict with broader ethical obligations.
The emphasis on individual benefit for disadvantaged populations might overlook collective responsibilities and the potential for societal advancement through research.

Conclusions:

The amendments risk misrepresenting the nature of scientific progress and its societal context.
Overly stringent prioritization of participant interests may inadvertently weaken foundational ethical principles such as altruism and responsibility.
A balanced approach is needed to uphold participant rights while fostering a sense of collective duty in biomedical research.