Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
How Data are Classified: Categorical Data01:11

How Data are Classified: Categorical Data

A variable, usually notated by capital letters such as X and Y, is a characteristic or measurement that can be determined for each member of a population. Data are the actual values of variables. They may be numbers, or they may be words. Datum is a single value.
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
Sample Size Calculation01:19

Sample Size Calculation

Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
How Data are Classified: Numerical Data00:59

How Data are Classified: Numerical Data

Data that are countable or measurable in specific units are called numerical or quantitative data. Quantitative data are always numbers. Quantitative data are the result of counting or measuring the attributes of a population. Amount of money, pulse rate, weight, number of people living in a town, and number of students who opt for statistics are examples of quantitative data.
Quantitative data may be either discrete or continuous. All quantitative data that take on only specific numerical...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Air Pollution Mixture and Folate Status Indicators among Pregnant Women in Canada: Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals (MIREC) Study, 2008 to 2011.

Current developments in nutrition·2026
Same author

Metabolomic Profiles of Inflammation Associated With Incident Ischemic Stroke Risk in Women.

Neurology·2026
Same author

Associations of Combined Genetic and Lifestyle Risks With Incident Type 2 Diabetes in the UK Biobank.

Diabetes·2026
Same author

A Randomized Trial of Vitamin D Supplementation and COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes and Long COVID: The Vitamin D for COVID-19 Trial.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

A plasma metabolomic fingerprint of moderate or severe hearing loss.

Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society·2026
Same author

Plasma metabolomic signature of breastfeeding and risk of cardiometabolic diseases.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Sample size and statistical power considerations in high-dimensionality data settings: a comparative study of

Yu Guo1, Armin Graber, Robert N McBurney

  • 1BG Medicine, Inc., 610 Lincoln St., Waltham, MA 02451, USA.

BMC Bioinformatics
|September 7, 2010
PubMed
Summary

High-dimensional omics data requires careful classifier selection for biomedical studies. Simulation studies show no single method excels, guiding optimal study design for disease prediction using various algorithms.

More Related Videos

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Omics data is high-dimensional, with more features than subjects.
  • Biomedical studies aim to discover features and algorithms for binary outcome prediction (e.g., disease status).

Purpose of the Study:

  • Compare four common classifiers (KNN, PAM, Random Forests, SVM) in high-dimensional settings.
  • Evaluate effects of signal-to-noise ratio, class imbalance, and performance metrics.
  • Guide biomedical study design for high-dimensional omics data.

Main Methods:

  • Compared K-Nearest Neighbors, Prediction Analysis for Microarrays (PAM), Random Forests, and Support Vector Machines.
  • Evaluated classifier performance under varying signal-to-noise ratios and class imbalances.
  • Utilized simulation studies and analyzed data from seven omics studies.

Main Results:

  • Human omics studies showed lower effect sizes, higher biological variation, and more outliers than animal studies.
  • PAM classifier performed best with Gaussian distributions and balanced classes.
  • Random Forests excelled with skewed distributions and unbalanced classes.

Conclusions:

  • No single classifier is optimal for all high-dimensional omics data settings.
  • Simulation studies offer valuable guidance for designing biomedical studies with high-dimensional data.