Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

XPERT NCT--a clinical evaluation.

K J Myers1, P Lalle, A Litwak

  • 1VA Outpatient Clinic, Grand Rapids, MI 49502.

Journal of the American Optometric Association
|November 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CT metal artifact reduction algorithms: Toward a framework for objective performance assessment.

Medical physics·2020
Same author

Assessment of bulbar function in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: validation of a self-report scale (Center for Neurologic Study Bulbar Function Scale).

European journal of neurology·2018
Same author

Drug Information Association (DIA) - 52nd Annual Meeting (June 26-30, 2016 - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA).

Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998)·2016
Same author

Impact of Non-Consented Switch and Subsequent Switch in Asthma Medication: Qualitative Study of Patient Perspective in the UK.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2016
Same author

Incretin-based medications for type 2 diabetes: an overview of reviews.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2015
Same author

Objective assessment of image quality and dose reduction in CT iterative reconstruction.

Medical physics·2014
Same journal

Visual skills profiles.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
Same journal

Dark adaptation and night blindness.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
Same journal

Scleral tonometry.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
Same journal

Staying in shape: the different roads to fitness for busy optometrists.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
Same journal

Hiring a new optometrist? Be prepared!

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
Same journal

Late traumatic intraocular lens extrusion after penetrating keratoplasty.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
See all related articles

The XPERT non-contact tonometer (NCT) shows high accuracy and reliability in measuring intraocular pressure (IOP). This clinical evaluation found it comparable to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), offering a convenient and user-friendly alternative.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Device Evaluation
  • Glaucoma Diagnostics

Background:

  • Accurate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is crucial for diagnosing and managing glaucoma.
  • Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is a standard reference but can be operator-dependent.
  • Non-contact tonometers (NCTs) offer potential advantages in ease of use and infection control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clinically evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Reichert XPERT NCT.
  • To compare XPERT NCT measurements against established Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) readings.
  • To assess the usability and patient acceptance of the XPERT NCT.

Main Methods:

  • A clinical evaluation involving 620 eyes at the Baltimore VA Medical Center.
  • Simultaneous measurements using the XPERT NCT and calibrated Goldmann applanation tonometers (GATs) by multiple operators.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Varied measurement intervals (minutes to an hour) to account for potential variability.
  • Main Results:

    • XPERT NCT measurements showed close agreement with GAT.
    • Population IOP means agreed within 0.3 mmHg.
    • Regression analysis yielded a slope (m) of 1.025 and a Y-intercept (b) of 0.7 mmHg, with a standard deviation of matched pair differences (Sd) of 2.7 mmHg.

    Conclusions:

    • The XPERT NCT is a highly accurate and reliable instrument for IOP measurement.
    • It demonstrated convenience, ease of use, and positive acceptance by staff and patients.
    • Compared to older NCT models, the XPERT NCT features a quieter and less intense air-puff.