Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026
12:10
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Comparative analysis of global practice patterns in urologic robot-assisted surgery.
Bertram E Yuh1, Abid Hussain, Rameela Chandrasekhar
1Department of Urology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Journal of Endourology
|September 8, 2010
Summary
Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is growing globally in urology, but often seen as an alternative. Despite less training and access, more surgeons in the Middle East and Asia consider RAS the standard of care.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Technology
Background:
- Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is increasingly adopted in urologic procedures worldwide.
- Understanding global disparities in RAS adoption and perception is crucial for its advancement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted urologic surgery between Europe/North America (ENA) and the Middle East/Asia (MEA).
Main Methods:
- A survey of 291 urologists at international conferences in 2008 assessed practice patterns in minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgery.
- Data from ENA and MEA regions were compared regarding training, case volume, and perceived role of RAS.
Main Results:
- Urologists in ENA reported more formal training and higher volumes of RAS cases compared to MEA.
- Lack of robotic systems was a major barrier in MEA, while ENA had more established RAS support and training.
- Despite lower adoption, MEA urologists were more likely to view RAS as the surgical gold standard for prostatectomy, cystectomy, and nephrectomy.
Conclusions:
- Robot-assisted surgery adoption in urology shows global growth but is perceived more as an alternative than a benchmark.
- Significant differences in training, access, and perceived status of RAS exist between ENA and MEA.
- Further research should focus on the evolving attitudes towards RAS in different global regions.
