Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

09:35
Microcrystallography of Protein Crystals and In Cellulo Diffraction
Published on: July 21, 2017
Percentile-based spread: a more accurate way to compare crystallographic models
1University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA. epozhars@rx.umaryland.edu
Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography
|September 9, 2010
Summary
The percentile-based spread (p.b.s.) offers a more robust method for comparing biomacromolecular crystal structures than traditional root-mean-square distance. This new measure better represents average atomic variations, even with outliers present.
Area of Science:
- Structural biology
- Biophysics
- Crystallography
Background:
- Biomacromolecular crystal structure comparison traditionally uses root-mean-square distance (RMSD).
- RMSD is sensitive to outliers, disproportionately affecting the comparison.
- A need exists for a more robust measure of structural variation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and validate the percentile-based spread (p.b.s.) as an alternative to RMSD.
- To demonstrate p.b.s.'s effectiveness in representing average atomic position variations.
- To evaluate p.b.s. in diverse crystallographic contexts.
Main Methods:
- Development of the percentile-based spread (p.b.s.) metric.
- Application of p.b.s. to compare biomacromolecular crystal structures.
- Analysis of p.b.s. performance with simulated and real crystallographic data.
Main Results:
- The percentile-based spread (p.b.s.) provides a more adequate representation of average atomic position variation.
- p.b.s. is less sensitive to outliers compared to traditional RMSD.
- p.b.s. is applicable to isomorphous structures, conformational changes, and model ensembles.
Conclusions:
- The percentile-based spread (p.b.s.) is a superior metric for comparing biomacromolecular crystal structures.
- p.b.s. offers enhanced accuracy and robustness, particularly in the presence of data variations.
- This method improves the analysis of structural dynamics and ensemble data in crystallography.
Related Concept Videos
Molecular Models
43.5K
Physical models representing molecular architectures of chemical compounds play essential roles in understanding chemistry. The use of molecular models makes it easier to visualize the structures and shapes of atoms and molecules.
43.5K
X-ray Crystallography
25.8K
The size of the unit cell and the arrangement of atoms in a crystal may be determined from measurements of the diffraction of X-rays by the crystal, termed X-ray crystallography.
Diffraction
Diffraction is the change in the direction of travel experienced by an electromagnetic wave when it encounters a physical barrier whose dimensions are comparable to those of the wavelength of the light. X-rays are electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths about as long as the distance between neighboring...
Diffraction
Diffraction is the change in the direction of travel experienced by an electromagnetic wave when it encounters a physical barrier whose dimensions are comparable to those of the wavelength of the light. X-rays are electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths about as long as the distance between neighboring...
25.8K
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
48.2K
Tetrahedral Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
48.2K

