Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026
04:57
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Exploring risk groups workplace bullying with categorical data.
Guy Notelaers1, Jeroen K Vermunt, Elfi Baillien
1Bergen Bullying Research Group, Faculty of Psychology, Bergen University, Norway. guy.notelaers@uib.no
Industrial Health
|September 9, 2010
Summary
This study identified six workplace bullying exposure groups, with 3.6% experiencing severe bullying. Risk factors include age (35-54), public service, and manufacturing jobs, informing targeted prevention strategies.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health
- Psychology
- Sociology
Background:
- Workplace bullying is a significant issue affecting employee well-being and organizational productivity.
- Previous research has often treated workplace bullying as a monolithic phenomenon, potentially overlooking diverse experiences and risk factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify distinct exposure groups of workplace bullying within a large, heterogeneous sample.
- To investigate the demographic and occupational risk factors associated with different levels of workplace bullying exposure.
Main Methods:
- A large, heterogeneous sample was utilized to categorize individuals into different workplace bullying exposure groups.
- Multinomial logistic regression analysis was employed to examine the relationship between identified exposure groups and social demographics.
Main Results:
- Six distinct workplace bullying exposure groups were identified, ranging from no bullying (30.5%) to severe bullying (3.6%).
- Elevated risks for workplace bullying were found in employees aged 35-54, public servants, blue-collar workers, and those in the food and manufacturing industries.
- Conversely, younger employees (<25), temporary contract workers, teachers, nurses, and assistant nurses were found to be at lower risk.
Conclusions:
- The study highlights the heterogeneity of workplace bullying experiences, necessitating tailored prevention strategies.
- Identifying specific risk groups allows for targeted interventions to mitigate workplace bullying.
- Findings provide crucial data for policymakers to develop effective national and organizational anti-bullying initiatives.
Related Concept Videos
02:04Bullying
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is bullying.
01:11How Data are Classified: Categorical Data
A variable, usually notated by capital letters such as X and Y, is a characteristic or measurement that can be determined for each member of a population. Data are the actual values of variables. They may be numbers, or they may be words. Datum is a single value.
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
02:16Stereotype Content Model
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
02:55Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
01:29Contingency Table
A contingency table provides a way of portraying data that can facilitate calculating probabilities. It is a method of displaying a frequency distribution as a table with rows and columns to show how two variables may be dependent (contingent) upon each other; The table helps determine conditional probabilities quite quickly and can help systematically organize, analyze and quantify data. The table displays sample values concerning two variables that may be dependent or contingent on one...
01:20Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...