Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Stability and Structure of Bat Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I with Heterologous β2-Microglobulin
Published on: March 10, 2021
Genetic structure and contrasting selection pattern at two major histocompatibility complex genes in wild house mouse
D Cížková1, J Gouy de Bellocq, S J E Baird
1Department of Population Biology, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic. dejsha@seznam.cz
Evolutionary patterns of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes can differ significantly, even for closely linked genes like H-2Aa and H-2Eb in European house mice. Choosing which MHC gene to study is crucial for accurate evolutionary insights.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary genetics
- Immunogenetics
- Population genetics
Background:
- The mammalian major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is a critical immune gene cluster often inherited as a unit.
- This has led to the assumption that studying a single MHC gene can represent the evolutionary patterns of the entire complex.
- However, the evolutionary dynamics of individual MHC genes may vary.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare evolutionary signals and diversification patterns between two closely linked MHC class II genes (H-2Aa and H-2Eb).
- To investigate MHC variation across a 1000-km transect of the European house mouse hybrid zone.
- To determine if studying a single MHC gene provides representative evolutionary insights.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of MHC variation across a European house mouse hybrid zone.
- Comparison of evolutionary patterns and selection signals at H-2Aa and H-2Eb genes.
- Assessment of allelic polymorphism, mutation rates, selection, and population structuring.
Main Results:
- Despite close linkage (0.01 cM), H-2Aa and H-2Eb exhibit disparate evolutionary patterns.
- H-2Aa shows higher polymorphism, faster turnover, stronger positive selection, and greater population structuring.
- H-2Eb alleles have longer persistence, mixed selection pressures (positive and negative), and instances of non-expression.
Conclusions:
- Evolutionary studies of MHC genes in wild vertebrates yield substantially different results depending on the specific gene examined.
- The level of polymorphism in a related species is an unreliable criterion for selecting an MHC gene for study.
- Close linkage does not guarantee similar evolutionary trajectories for MHC genes.
Related Concept Videos
Frequency-dependent Selection
Incomplete Dominance
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
Gene Flow
Types of Selection
What is Population Genetics?

