Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes02:45

The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes

In most organisms, sex is determined by the ratio of X and Y chromosomes. However, in some organisms, such as Drosophila and C.elegans, sex is determined by the ratio of the number of X chromosomes to the number of sets of autosomes. The Y chromosome in Drosophila is active but does not determine sex. It contains genes responsible for the production of sperms in adult flies.  
Normal male Drosophila has a ratio of one X chromosome to two sets of autosomes. In contrast, normal female Drosophila...
Pleiotropy01:33

Pleiotropy

Pleiotropy is the phenomenon in which a single gene impacts multiple, seemingly unrelated phenotypic traits. For example, defects in the SOX10 gene cause Waardenburg Syndrome Type 4, or WS4, which can cause defects in pigmentation, hearing impairments, and an absence of intestinal contractions necessary for elimination. This diversity of phenotypes results from the expression pattern of SOX10 in early embryonic and fetal development. SOX10 is found in neural crest cells that form melanocytes,...
Dosage Compensation02:50

Dosage Compensation

In animals, gender is determined by the number and type of sex chromosome. For example, human females have two X chromosomes, and males have one X and one Y chromosome, whereas C.elegans with one X chromosome is a male, and the one with two X chromosomes is a hermaphrodite.
In addition to sexual development, the X chromosome has genes involved in autosomal functions such as brain development and the immune system. Therefore, males and females with  distinct numbers of X chromosomes will have...
Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification01:29

Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification

Intramembranous ossification is one of the two processes involved in the development of bones within an embryo. The flat bones of the face, most of the cranial bones, and the clavicles are formed via this process. During intramembranous ossification, the bones develop directly from sheets of undifferentiated mesenchymal connective tissue.
The process begins when mesenchymal cells in the embryonic skeleton gather together and differentiate into osteogenic cells, which then develop into...
Sutures of the Skull01:22

Sutures of the Skull

The human skull is composed of several bones that come together to protect the brain and support the structures of the face. The junctions where these bones meet are called sutures.
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
Bone Formation by Endochondral Ossification01:24

Bone Formation by Endochondral Ossification

Bone formation, or ossification, begins around the sixth to seventh week of embryonic development. Most bones develop from a cartilaginous template through the process of endochondral ossification. Cartilage formation begins when clusters of mesenchymal cells differentiate into chondrocytes. These chondrocytes proliferate rapidly and secrete an extracellular matrix that becomes encased in a membrane called the perichondrium. The resulting cartilage model provides a template that resembles the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bclaf1 critically regulates the type I interferon response and is degraded by alphaherpesvirus US3.

PLoS pathogens·2019
Same author

Coxsackievirus B3 Infection Triggers Autophagy through 3 Pathways of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress.

Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES·2019
Same author

Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: a Multicenter Propensity Matching Analysis with HBV-HCC.

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract·2019
Same author

High Expressions of CUL4A and TP53 in Colorectal Cancer Predict Poor Survival.

Cellular physiology and biochemistry : international journal of experimental cellular physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology·2018
Same author

Polysaccharide produced by Bacillus subtilis using burdock oligofructose as carbon source.

Carbohydrate polymers·2018
Same author

Laparoscopic versus open mesohepatectomy for patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matched analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2018
Same journal

Divergent Spatiotemporal Expression Patterns of Histone Deacetylases During Mouse Embryonic Tongue, Palate, and Mandible Development.

Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)·2026
Same journal

Ectopic Bulged Structures in Nkx2-1-KO and FoxE-KO Juveniles of Ciona robusta: Insights Into the Parallel Gene Regulatory System Before the Evolution of Thyroid Follicular Cells.

Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)·2026
Same journal

Meet Our Editorial Board-Genesis. An Interview With Anna Di Gregorio, New York University, New York, USA.

Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)·2026
Same journal

Multiplexed Retinoic Acid Signal Reporters for In Vivo and In Vitro Use.

Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)·2026
Same journal

Generation and Characterization of Twist1 Acetyl-Mimic and Acetyl-Deficient Mouse Models.

Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)·2026
Same journal

Phylogenetic Comparison and Splice Site Conservation of the Animal SMNDC1 Gene Family.

Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Isolation of Whole Cell Protein Lysates from Mouse Facial Processes and Cultured Palatal Mesenchyme Cells for Phosphoprotein Analysis
07:26

Isolation of Whole Cell Protein Lysates from Mouse Facial Processes and Cultured Palatal Mesenchyme Cells for Phosphoprotein Analysis

Published on: April 1, 2022

Msx1 and Dlx5 function synergistically to regulate frontal bone development.

Il-Hyuk Chung1, Jun Han, Junichi Iwata

  • 1Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.

Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)
|September 9, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Homeobox proteins Msx1 and Dlx5 synergistically regulate frontal bone development. Their interaction is crucial for osteogenic induction, with Msx1 essential for Dlx5 expression in this tissue.

More Related Videos

Tissue Preparation and Immunostaining of Mouse Craniofacial Tissues and Undecalcified Bone
10:03

Tissue Preparation and Immunostaining of Mouse Craniofacial Tissues and Undecalcified Bone

Published on: May 10, 2019

Analyzing Craniofacial Morphogenesis in Zebrafish Using 4D Confocal Microscopy
09:16

Analyzing Craniofacial Morphogenesis in Zebrafish Using 4D Confocal Microscopy

Published on: January 30, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Isolation of Whole Cell Protein Lysates from Mouse Facial Processes and Cultured Palatal Mesenchyme Cells for Phosphoprotein Analysis
07:26

Isolation of Whole Cell Protein Lysates from Mouse Facial Processes and Cultured Palatal Mesenchyme Cells for Phosphoprotein Analysis

Published on: April 1, 2022

Tissue Preparation and Immunostaining of Mouse Craniofacial Tissues and Undecalcified Bone
10:03

Tissue Preparation and Immunostaining of Mouse Craniofacial Tissues and Undecalcified Bone

Published on: May 10, 2019

Analyzing Craniofacial Morphogenesis in Zebrafish Using 4D Confocal Microscopy
09:16

Analyzing Craniofacial Morphogenesis in Zebrafish Using 4D Confocal Microscopy

Published on: January 30, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Biology
  • Genetics
  • Craniofacial Development

Background:

  • Msx and Dlx homeobox proteins are key regulators of embryogenesis.
  • Msx1 deficiency causes craniofacial defects, while Dlx5 null mutations primarily impact craniofacial bone development.
  • Overlapping expression of Msx1 and Dlx5 in the frontal bone suggests a functional relationship.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the functional interaction between Msx1 and Dlx5 in regulating frontal bone development.
  • To determine the synergistic effects of Msx1 and Dlx5 on osteogenesis.
  • To elucidate the role of Msx1 in Dlx5 expression during frontal bone formation.

Main Methods:

  • Generation and analysis of Msx1 and Dlx5 double null mutant mice.
  • Comparative assessment of frontal bone defects in single and double mutants.
  • Examination of gene expression patterns and their regulatory relationships.

Main Results:

  • Msx1(-/-);Dlx5(-/-) double null mutant mice exhibit more severe frontal bone defects than single mutants.
  • Msx1 and Dlx5 demonstrate synergistic function in regulating osteogenesis within the frontal bone.
  • Dlx5 expression in the frontal bone is dependent on the presence of Msx1.

Conclusions:

  • Msx1 and Dlx5 interact synergistically to control osteogenic induction during frontal bone development.
  • This interaction represents a tissue-specific regulatory mechanism for Msx and Dlx genes.
  • The findings highlight the critical role of Msx1/Dlx5 interplay in craniofacial bone formation.