Do meta-analyses in nephrology change the way we treat patients?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

5/6 Nephrectomy Using Sharp Bipolectomy Via Midline Laparotomy in Rats
Published on: April 4, 2025
Sumit Mohan1, Jai Radhakrishnan
1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032, USA. sm2206@columbia.edu
Abstract:
There has been an exponential increase in the number of nephrological meta-analyses published, but their relative contribution to the nephrology literature is unclear and their influence on physician behavior and evidence-based patient care is poorly understood. We studied the nephrology literature, point-of-care resources, guidelines, and a questionnaire survey of the New York Society of Nephrology membership to understand the role and perception of meta-analyses in nephrology. We discuss our results in the context of the strengths and limitations of meta-analyses and their relatively limited, albeit increasing influence on published guidelines and on point-of-care references. The results of our practitioner survey and our review of the nephrology literature suggest an increasing influence at the level of the individual practitioner of meta-analyses. This underlines the need to develop a better understanding of the contributions and role of meta-analyses in the literature.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions