Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Glycyrrhiza (licorice) in the treatment of psychiatric illness; a preliminary clinical report.

Journal of clinical and experimental psychopathology·2014

Same author

Non-Interfering Cardiovascular Diagnostics and Blood Pressure.

Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering·2013

Same author

New space domain processing technique for pulsed laser velocimetry.

Applied optics·2010

Same author

Real time optical correlator using a magnetooptic device applied to particle imaging velocimetry.

Applied optics·2010

Same author

Surface fluctuation scattering using grating heterodyne spectroscopy.

Applied optics·2010

Same author

Temperature profiling by Rayleigh-scattering lidar.

Applied optics·2010

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

High-speed Particle Image Velocimetry Near Surfaces

High-speed Particle Image Velocimetry Near Surfaces

Published on: June 24, 2013

Laser velocimeters: lower limits to uncertainty.

L Lading, R V Edwards

|September 11, 2010

Summary

This study shows that laser velocimeter accuracy limits are not fundamental. Advanced signal processing techniques can significantly improve laser velocimetry performance.

Area of Science:

Optical Measurement
Metrology
Signal Processing

Background:

Laser velocimetry utilizes light scattering for non-contact velocity measurements.
Existing accuracy limits in many-particle and rough surface scattering are well-established.
Current methods may not fully exploit the potential of signal processing.

Purpose of the Study:

To challenge the notion of fundamental accuracy limits in laser velocimetry.
To explore the role of advanced signal processing in enhancing performance.
To present general processing schemes and discuss their limitations.

Main Methods:

Analysis of laser velocimeters employing many-particle scattering.
Analysis of laser velocimeters employing rough surface scattering.

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Measurement of Turbulence and Particle Kinematics Using Flow Imaging Techniques

Simultaneous Measurement of Turbulence and Particle Kinematics Using Flow Imaging Techniques

Published on: March 12, 2019

Quantitatively Measuring In situ Flows using a Self-Contained Underwater Velocimetry Apparatus (SCUVA)

Quantitatively Measuring In situ Flows using a Self-Contained Underwater Velocimetry Apparatus (SCUVA)

Published on: October 31, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

High-speed Particle Image Velocimetry Near Surfaces

High-speed Particle Image Velocimetry Near Surfaces

Published on: June 24, 2013

Simultaneous Measurement of Turbulence and Particle Kinematics Using Flow Imaging Techniques

Simultaneous Measurement of Turbulence and Particle Kinematics Using Flow Imaging Techniques

Published on: March 12, 2019

Quantitatively Measuring In situ Flows using a Self-Contained Underwater Velocimetry Apparatus (SCUVA)

Quantitatively Measuring In situ Flows using a Self-Contained Underwater Velocimetry Apparatus (SCUVA)

Published on: October 31, 2011

Development and presentation of linear and nonlinear signal processing schemes.

Main Results:

Demonstration that established accuracy limits are not fundamental.
Identification of signal processing as a key factor for performance enhancement.
Presentation of generic processing schemes applicable to various scattering conditions.

Conclusions:

The performance of laser velocimeters can be improved beyond current perceived limits.
Advanced signal processing offers a pathway to higher accuracy in laser velocimetry.
Further research into specific processing algorithms and their limitations is warranted.